Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Holyrood agrees to examine call for action to protect Highland landscape from industrialisation

Highland campaigner James Treasurer.
Highland campaigner James Treasurer.

An influential group of MSPs is to probe claims that one of the north’s most magnificent landscapes is being turned into a huge “industrial complex”.

Holyrood’s public petitions committee has agreed to investigate a campaign group’s concerns about the future of the Great Glen and Loch Ness and launch a wide-ranging consultation.

Members want to know if Highland Council, Scottish National Heritage (SNH), the trade body Scottish Renewables, the John Muir Trust (JMT) charity and the Scottish Government are worried that hundreds of wind turbines will ruin the natural beauty of the area and damage tourism.

They decided to act after James Treasurer – of the Friends of the Great Glen – appeared before the committee to make an emotional plea.

The Lochaber-based marine biologist said his group wanted the area designated a National Scenic Area and given World Heritage protection to safeguard it for future generations.

He told MSPs that data from the local authority and SNH showed that 500-plus turbines have been built, granted permission or are proposed within a 22-mile radius of Loch Ness.

“Our concern is the multitude of windfarm development that is being planned and in the pipeline for the Great Glen area and the Loch Ness area,” he told them.

“The distressing thing is not just the wind turbines, because these are at remote locations.

“It is going to involve hundreds of miles of pylons to connect these to the National Grid, hundreds of miles of access roads, building of substations.

“It is going to be a big industrial complex for about 30 miles on each side of the Great Glen. We are extremely concerned.”

Later Mr Treasurer, a seasoned presenter in his role as a scientist, said he enjoyed the experience at the Scottish Parliament and felt the committee gave him a “fair hearing”.

He said: “They’ve agreed to consult with the various planning bodies such as SNH, the council, JMT and others.

“In answer to the committee’s questions about tourism, I pointed out that a 20% loss of tourists, as indicated by the government’s own survey five years ago, may seem a low percentage.

“But, for the industry, that would have a huge impact.”

Highland Council’s planning chairman Thomas Prag said the local authority would assist the process “in any way it can”.

A spokesman for Scottish Renewables said: “There are incredibly rigorous planning rules in place to govern all new schemes and protect our most iconic landscapes and sensitive habitats.

“These include a blanket ban on windfarms in national scenic areas and national parks, and special procedures to assess applications for turbines in areas identified as ‘wild land’ by SNH.”

Helen McDade, of wild land charity JMT, said: “We have been raising concerns about the cumulative impact of excessive industrial-scale wind developments in the Highlands for some time.

“Scotland urgently needs a spatial energy plan and national energy commission helping the government to take account of both energy security issues, but also natural and cultural heritage issues.”

Neil Reid, of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, said: “We hope the Friends of the Great Glen campaign is successful – but our position goes further.

“All of Scotland’s mountains and wild land require protection from inappropriate development.

“We would urge MSPs to extend increased protection nationally rather than limiting it to one specific area.”