Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Russia report: Five key findings

Russian president Vladimir Putin

Nine months on from its intended publication date, the House of Commons Russia report has finally been made public.

The report shines a light on the Kremlin’s reach in UK politics, from social media posts and propaganda to party donations. So, beyond the main headlines, just what does it say?

Here are five key points:

Social media is failing us

The intelligence and security committee criticised the role of social media giants in the spread of Russian disinformation.

“Social media companies hold the key and yet they are failing to play their part”, the committee wrote.

MPs said the UK Government must now seek to “establish a protocol” with social media companies to ensure that “they take covert hostile state use of their platforms seriously, and have clear timescales within which they commit to removing such material”.

If firms fail to cooperate, ministers should name and shame them, the committee said.

 

Digging for dirt

The report notes the growth of “enablers” alongside the arrival of Russian money in the UK.

It says: “A large private security industry has developed in the UK to service the needs of the Russian elite, in which British companies protect the oligarchs and their families, seek ‘kompromat’ on competitors, and on occasion help launder money through offshore shell companies and fabricate ‘due diligence’ reports, while lawyers provide litigation support.”

‘Kompromat’ is the Russian word for compromising information to be used in blackmailing or manipulating someone, usually for political purposes.

William Browder, who is a financier and fierce critic of President Putin, told the committee, in testimony published today, that: “Russian state interests, working in conjunction with and through criminal private interests, set up a ‘buffer’ of Westerners who become de facto Russian state agents, many unwittingly, but others with a reason to know exactly what they are doing and for whom.

“As a result, UK actors have to deal with Russian criminal interests masked as state interests, and Russian state interests masked by their Western agents.”

 

Putin’s Parliament?

The report suggests President Putin’s apparatchiks have “broad influence” in Westminster.

It states that Russian intelligence and Russian business are “completely intertwined” and suggests that firms are acting as a front to influence politicians.

The video briefing by members of the Intelligence and Security Committee on their long-awaited report on Russia’s activities in the UK which has concluded that the Government “took its eye off the ball” and failed to respond to Moscow’s threat.

It states: “Several members of the Russian elite who are closely linked to Putin are identified as being involved with charitable and/or political organisations in the UK, having donated to political parties, with a public profile which positions them to assist Russian influence operations.

“It is notable that a number of Members of the House of Lords have business interests linked to Russia, or work directly for major Russian companies linked to the Russian state – these relationships should be carefully scrutinised, given the potential for the Russian state to exploit them.”

 

Blame game

The report concludes the UK Government took its “eye off the ball” and failed to respond to the threat of interference in UK democracy from Moscow.

It says they government “badly underestimating the Russian threat” until only recently.

It accepts there has been “very considerable pressure” on the intelligence agencies since 9/11 – and they’ve been left with limited resources.

“Nevertheless”, it says, “reacting to the here and now is inherently inefficient and – in our opinion – until recently, the Government had badly underestimated the Russian threat and the response it required.”

 

Defenceless?

No one organisation in the UK recognises itself as having an overall lead on defending the UK’s democratic processes, and the report says “discourse has appeared to be something of a ‘hot potato’”.

It says: “Whilst we understand the nervousness around any suggestion that the intelligence and security agencies might be involved in democratic processes – certainly a fear that is writ large in other countries – that cannot apply when it comes to the protection of those processes. And without seeking in any way to imply that DCMS [Department for Culture, Media and Sport] is not capable, or that the Electoral Commission is not a staunch defender of democracy, it is a question of scale and access.

“DCMS is a small Whitehall policy department and the Electoral Commission is an arm’s length body; neither is in the central position required to tackle a major hostile state threat to our democracy.

“Protecting our democratic discourse and processes from hostile foreign interference is a central responsibility of government, and should be a ministerial priority.”

The operation role should sit primarily with MI5, the report says.

Russia report: Call for inquiry after ISC finds ‘credible’ evidence of attempt to influence 2014 Scottish independence referendum

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]

More from the Press and Journal UK politics team

More from the Press and Journal