Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Judges will be asked to resolve Brexit power-grab row between UK and Scottish governments

Judges will be asked to resolve disputes between the UK and Scottish governments over who sets standards when powers return from Brussels post-Brexit, it has been revealed.

The devolved administrations and opposition MPs have been calling for a dispute resolution panel to decide on disagreements as powers return from the EU and common frameworks, which govern everything from agriculture to air quality, are set.

Alok Sharma.

Business Secretary Alok Sharma was asked four times to commit to such a panel when he introduced proposals for a UK internal market in the Commons on July 16.

Mr Sharma dodged the questions, telling MPs his proposals would see “a power surge” for the devolved governments.

This afternoon Mr Sharma’s colleague, Martin Callanan, was more open when grilled by peers.

We have no intention of setting up an alternative dispute resolution procedure when we have one of the best and most efficient court systems in the world to resolve disputes.”

Lord Callanan

Plaid Cymru’s Lord Wigley asked: “Does the minister recognise that the acceptability of these proposals will depend on the credibility of any dispute resolution system, and if so, will all four nations have an equal voice within such a system?”

Lord Callanan responded: “I hope there won’t be any disputes, but if there were they would be legal disputes and the correct forum for resolving legal disputes is through the court system.

“We have no intention of setting up an alternative dispute resolution procedure when we have one of the best and most efficient court systems in the world to resolve disputes.”

The comments will invite further distrust from the devolved administrations, who have been locked in a lengthy dispute about who will ultimately be responsible for setting standards previously set by the EU.

The Scottish Government has said the current proposal, which requires all four nations to accept goods and services from other parts of the UK, even if they have set different standards locally, makes a mockery of devolution.

Mike Russell.

In a letter to Michael Gove, Scotland’s constitution minister Mike Russell did not mince his words, saying the “Scottish Government could not, and would not, accept any such plans. Nor would we co-operate with them”.

But the UK Government has already demonstrated its willingness to use parliamentary sovereignty to override the devolved administrations in the face of dissent.

In January Westminster passed the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 despite the unprecedented situation of all three devolved legislatures refusing to give consent under the Sewel convention; if faced with the same situation over a new internal market bill, the UK parliament could once again force it through.

Following Lord Callanan’s comments, there are now questions over where disputes would be resolved: in the English and Welsh courts or in Scotland.