Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

British film industry ‘can be worse than Hollywood for female filmmakers’

The British film industry is lacking in gender equality in key production roles and can sometimes be worse for women than Hollywood, a new study has found.

Research conducted by academics from the University of Southampton and the University of Exeter found women directors, editors, cinematographers, screenwriters, producers and executive producers are under-represented in UK film.

The results come just months after American filmmaker Greta Gerwig became only the fifth woman to ever be nominated for a directing prize at the Oscars in its 90-year history.

Overall, more than half (56%) of British films looked at in the study were found to have one or no women in any of the key productions roles, compared with just less than a third (30%) of US films.

It was also found that films made in collaboration with the UK and other nations are more likely to have a female director, editor or screenwriter than those made solely in the UK.

The research found that nearly a quarter (24%) of directors are women on co-productions, compared with 11% on UK domestic films.

Another finding was that women cinematographers and producers are more likely to find work on lower budget films, and that women are “squeezed out” as the budget for a film rises.

The study, called Calling The Shots: Women And Contemporary Film Culture In The UK, was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), and saw the academics look at 203 British qualifying films in production in 2015 to collect their data.

These were compared with the top 250 films from the 2017 Annual Celluloid Ceiling report by San Diego State University, as the British films made in 2015 were mostly released in 2016/2017.

The results of the project were unveiled at events hosted by hosted by Women’s Film And Television UK at the Cannes Film Festival, where three of the 21 films in the competition this year have been directed by women.

Dr Shelley Cobb, from the University of Southampton, said: “We often encounter assumptions that the UK film industry must be better at gender equality than Hollywood, but our data clearly shows that this is not the case; in some ways the British industry is worse.

“Diversity and equality targets for funded films are good steps, but wider progress is going to require that white men notice how they dominate film sets and that they must consciously develop more diverse contacts and hiring practices.”

Professor Linda Ruth Williams, from the University of Exeter, said the research “identified in precise and damning detail the limited chances women have to flourish in the British film industry”.

She added that the “history-changing movements which have gripped the industry since last year belie the fact that it remains closed to women across many film-making professions.”

“Inequality of opportunity is rife. Will we still be telling this same old story at Cannes in 10 years’ time?”

The University of Southampton’s Dr Natalie Wreyford said the data is “further indication that the UK is not doing enough to improve gender inequality in key roles on British films, and it is troubling to consider what effect Brexit may have on women working in UK-qualifying films.”