Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Female writers face discrimination in TV and film, report finds

Bias against female writers and systemic problems are creating a “self-sustaining loop” of inequality in the screenwriting industry, a new report into gender representation has found.

Just 16% of all working screenwriters in film are female, with only 15% of films having credited female writers.

An even smaller percentage of films (11%) are written predominantly by women, a 10-year report commissioned by the Writers’ Guild of Great Britain (WGGB) has found, and fewer than 7% of films with a budget greater than £10 million are predominantly female-written.

The percentage of television episodes written by women stands at 28%, the research funded by the Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS) found, while just 14% of prime-time drama is predominantly female written.

There has been no significant improvement to the disparity over the 10 years, with unconscious bias among hirers, lack of formal or open hiring systems, inadequate equality data collection and ineffective regulatory systems all contributing to the lack of change, the report said.

Of more than 200 working writers polled, only 5% agreed that “the way writers are hired, and scripts are commissioned, is fair and free from discrimination”.

The majority of respondents also suggested that they had seen evidence of discrimination over the course of their careers.

Female writers face are being discriminated against in terms of the projects to which they are gaining access, the report found.

Female writers in TV are being pigeon-holed by genre and are unable to move from continuing drama or children’s programming to prime- time drama, comedy or light entertainment.

Female representation is particularly low in comedy (11%) and light entertainment (9%).

In film, women being denied opportunities to write for higher budget or more prestigious productions, despite evidence showing that female-written films lead at the box office and receive a more positive critical and audience reception than their male equivalents.

In the foreword to the report, WGGB general secretary Ellie Peers says the research “shines a light on two industries in which bias and systemic problems are creating what the authors describe as a “self-sustaining loop” of inequality.

“Bias among hirers, lack of formal or open hiring systems, inadequate equality data collection and ineffective regulatory systems form a complex web, which becomes further entangled with strands unique to the film and television industries themselves. ”

She adds: “Film is not, as is popularly believed, driven by the motive to make profit. If it were, women writers would be doing better.

“While the short-term nature of film productions is having its own impact on gender equality, in TV, conversely, the longevity and size of the centralised bodies involved allows negative practices to develop and become normalised over time.

“Gender inequality in film and TV is not limited solely to writers, and this report offers salutary findings here, too – key creative roles on film productions are held predominantly by men, and this is influencing female representation on screen. Gender representation among film producers is particularly problematic.

“We must ask ourselves what effect this is having on audiences and our culture and look to what it must tell us about other forms of inequality. If women writers are faring so badly in film and TV, surely the situation must be worse for BAME writers, or for writers with disabilities?

“The report rightly concludes that further concerted action is required to address this problem.”

The report suggests a number of key potential solutions, including a more comprehensive system of data collection and the publication of data within the industries in order to tackle the “inequality” of opportunity.

Another is to keep the industries focused on the issue, because if the lack of female input is constantly mentioned, there will be more of an overall effort to combat both unconscious bias and personal preference, the report says.