Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Coleen Rooney wanted ‘evidence’ for her sting operation, court told

Coleen Rooney has been giving evidence (Yui Mok/PA)
Coleen Rooney has been giving evidence (Yui Mok/PA)

Coleen Rooney has told the High Court she wanted a “totally untrue” story about a so-called gender selection procedure to be published as “evidence” for her sting operation to discover the source of leaked stories.

In the high-profile libel trial brought by Rebekah Vardy, Mrs Rooney began giving evidence at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday afternoon, and on Monday morning she returned to the witness box.

In a viral social media post in October 2019, Mrs Rooney, 36, said she had carried out a “sting operation” and accused Mrs Vardy, 40, of leaking “false stories” about her private life to the press – prompting her to be dubbed “Wagatha Christie”.

Mrs Vardy, who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, denies leaking stories to the media and is suing her fellow footballer’s wife for libel, while Mrs Rooney is defending the claim on the basis her post was “substantially true”.

‘Wagatha Christie’ trial
Rebekah Vardy arrives at the Royal Courts Of Justice (Yui Mok/PA)

The court previously heard that Mrs Rooney said that as part of this “sting operation” she planted three false stories on her private Instagram account, with the viewers restricted to only Mrs Vardy’s account, to see whether they would be leaked to The Sun newspaper.

One of these stories was posted on April 8 2019, with Mrs Rooney claiming she was travelling to Mexico to look into a procedure to determine a baby’s sex.

“Let’s go and see what this gender selection is all about,” Mrs Rooney posted, accompanied with a number of heart emojis and what appeared to be a grimacing face emoji.

Around four months later, The Sun published a story online on August 15 2019 with the headline “Col’s baby girl bid”, marked as an exclusive, detailing Mrs Rooney’s alleged “desperate bid to have a baby girl”.

Asked about this post by Mrs Vardy’s barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC on Monday, Mrs Rooney said: “I wanted the story to run so I had evidence.”

She added: “I felt that would be an extra step if the papers run it, I would have my story and the actual story in the paper.”

‘Wagatha Christie’ trial
Coleen and Wayne Rooney arrive at the court (Yui Mok/PA)

Mrs Rooney, who is married to former England footballer Wayne Rooney, continued: “I didn’t want it out there, I wanted it for my own evidence… It was a story that was out there but it was completely untrue.”

The High Court heard that earlier in August, PR Rachel Monk told Mrs Rooney The Sun was planning to write a story on her visiting Mexico over the treatment.

The footballer’s wife explained she told Ms Monk to tell the newspaper that she “can’t get hold of me”.

With The Sun seeking a comment on the story, Mrs Rooney told the court: “I just said don’t comment… so obviously that means they run it or not, it’s up to them.”

“I didn’t say no, I didn’t say yes.”

The court also heard that in March 2019 Mrs Rooney asked Ms Monk to find out who was the source of a story about herself and her husband securing a babysitter, following an approach from The Sun newspaper.

Mrs Rooney told the court she had a suspicion it was Mrs Vardy, telling the PR that she was allegedly “fame hungry” from “stuff she’s done at the World Cup”.

Hearing the accusation of being “fame hungry”, Mrs Vardy, sitting in the front row of Court 13 alongside her solicitors, appeared to shake her head.

‘Wagatha Christie’ trial
Rebekah Vardy has been watching Coleen Rooney give evidence (Yui Mok/PA)

Asked why she did not delete Mrs Vardy from her Instagram, Mrs Rooney said she did not want to “trap” her, adding: “I just wanted to find out who was doing this to me.”

“I thought by going public on Instagram and saying someone is doing this to me I thought it would stop,” she said, adding: “But it continued.”

Earlier on Monday, Mrs Rooney told the High Court she “had suspicions” that Mrs Vardy’s Instagram account was responsible for leaking information to journalists when she unfollowed her on the social media site.

The footballer’s wife accepted it would have been obvious to Mrs Vardy in March 2019 when she texted Mrs Rooney that she had been unfollowed.

Mrs Rooney said the pair were “not good friends” and that if someone had unfollowed her she would “probably just forget about it and not message” the person, adding: “I wouldn’t have been that bothered really.”

She said: “I felt it was suspicious. Obviously, I had suspicions in other ways, so this just added to the suspicions that I had.”

‘Wagatha Christie’ trial
Coleen Rooney is watched by her husband Wayne as she gives evidence (Elizabeth Cook/PA)

Mrs Rooney is defending the libel claim brought by Mrs Vardy on the basis of truth and public interest.

The libel battle comes after Mrs Rooney publicly claimed that an account behind three fake stories in The Sun that she had posted on her personal Instagram account was Mrs Vardy’s.

As well as the “gender selection” post, the fake stories Mrs Rooney planted on her Instagram during the sting operation also included her planning to return to TV, and the basement flooding at her home.

In the post on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook, she wrote: “I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them.

“It’s ………. Rebekah Vardy’s account.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in