Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Comment: Rising tension over Cap is no good for Scottish farming

Richard Lochhead (left) and Nigel Miller (right)
Richard Lochhead (left) and Nigel Miller (right)

Farmers have often been accused of moaning far too much, and NFU Scotland is living up to the stereotype this week.

The union has launched a fresh attack on the Scottish Government over its plans to transition from historic to area-based payments under the new Common Agricultural Policy (Cap).

According to the union, the plans drawn up by farm minister Richard Lochhead and his team, are a “leap in the dark” for Scots farmers and crofters.

It claims the move to area-based payments will push many established farm businesses “over a cliff edge” due to a sharper than first thought drop in subsidy payments next year, while many new entrants will not be recognised, and as a result receive no support, through the National Reserve.

Union president Nigel Miller said the transition plans were a “far cry from indications of a soft landing given when Scotland’s Cap announcement was made last June”.

Not stopping there, the farming chief who is set to retire from his post in February next year, accused the government of designing a system which had the sole focus of paying farmers on time in December 2015, rather than one which was best for Scottish farming.

“In driving forward the payment system, Cap implementation in Scotland appears to have been shaped by what suits software designers rather than being defined by Scottish policy requirements,” said Mr Miller.

“That may be the right priority for Scottish Government officials but the stakes are high and we would want Cabinet Secretary Richard Lochhead to acknowledge that there will be collateral damage to some Scottish farming businesses by focusing solely on what fits computer systems and the payment date.”

He called on Richard Lochhead to commission an “immediate independent analysis of the transition systems”, demanding it be underpinned by robust modelling and an easy-to-use ready reckoner.

The union also slammed the government’s communication with farmers this year, branding it “slow to emerge and incomplete”.

Mr Miller said: “This information fog has masked some of the difficult or unpopular decisions that have been made. That approach must change as hard information is crucial to important business decisions”.

On this point, the union isn’t far off the mark.

At this late stage in the year, it is hard to believe that the full details of the regime are not yet available to farmers.

It would seem Lochhead’s focus was on other matters for the first nine months of the year.

The union’s attack has sparked anger from Lochhead’s camp who argue the union got everything it asked for with Cap transition.

A firm-worded statement from a government spokeswoman said: “The Scottish Government has been transparent throughout the Cap reform process, working closely with NFU Scotland to take account of industry views, and swiftly relaying feedback from the EU to the Cap stakeholder group.

“The message we have been given throughout this process is that putting the right support mechanisms in place should be the priority. That is what we have done – and it is nonsense to suggest otherwise.”

She said the recent series of 37 government Cap meetings had been attended by more than 3,000 people, with 86% of attendees saying they felt much better informed and able to understand the new Cap.

In fact, if you jog your memory back to June this year, NFU Scotland welcomed the Cap announcement.

It had argued for a transition, rather than immediate switch, to area-based payments and Lochhead delivered.

It had also argued for a three region payment model and once again Lochhead delivered. I could go on.

Of course the devil was always going to be in the detail, and while the union is right to slam the government on its slow emergence of information, it cannot turn around and condemn the very plans it lobbied so hard for.

Cap reform was never going to be an easy pill to swallow for Scots producers.

For a large number of farmers, the move to area-based payments will result in a substantial cut in subsidy support, while for others the move will result in them receiving much-needed subsidy support for the first time ever.

Sadly the whole debate has become a bit of a Punch and Judy affair.

On the one hand we are arguing for payments to be made on time next December, while on the other arguing that the right system needs to be in place regardless of how long it takes to get the payments out.

Make your mind up – the Scottish farming sector can’t have its cake and eat it on this one.

Surely now is the time to stop arguing and sit around a table to thrash out the nitty gritty details of the plans and get them in place on farm.

The new Cap regime starts in 12 days whether we like it or not.