Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Nicola Sturgeon dismisses claim that officials interfered in Highland golf course plans

Coul Links, near Embo.
Coul Links, near Embo.

Nicola Sturgeon has dismissed claims that her officials interfered in plans for a controversial Highland golf course – amid warnings they risked repeating mistakes made during Donald Trump’s Aberdeenshire application.

The first minister was quizzed in Holyrood on the proposals for Coul Links in Sutherland.

Highland Green MSP John Finnie highlighted evidence that the developers had held “many meetings” with the Scottish Government, including the Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing.

Mr Finnie said: “When Donald Trump built his course in Aberdeenshire, we were told that it would improve the environment. The site there is now in danger of de-designation.

“Similar environmental improvement claims have been made about Coul Links. Does the first minister not see that history is repeating itself?

“How can we have faith in a planning process when there is this level of interference?”

US businessman Todd Warnock and world renowned golf course developer Mike Keiser are spearheading the proposals for the 18-hole course near Embo.

A petition against the scheme has been signed by almost 90,000 people – more than six times the population of Sutherland –  with part of the land on a Site of Special Scientific Interest.

Ms Sturgeon rubbished the accusations of interference at first minister’s questions, however.

The SNP leader said: “This is a live planning case and the planning application is currently being considered by Highland Council.

“It is important to note that no meetings with Scottish Government ministers or officials have taken place since the planning application was made.

“However, of course government engages with companies that are proposing planning developments, and the suggestion that we should never do that before planning applications are made is a ridiculous one.

“We regularly engage to try to encourage companies to invest in Scotland, but I add that part of the reason for the engagement is to help people who are proposing major developments to understand the strict planning rules that they must then adhere to.

“There has been such engagement in a range of developments—from the Lochaber smelter to Aberdeen harbour and Inverness castle, for example—but I stress that it took place before the planning applications were lodged.

“Once such an application has been lodged, it becomes live and is entirely a matter for the planning authority. That is right and proper, and it completely follows due process.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in



More from the Press and Journal Scottish politics team

More from the Press and Journal