Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Review group reveals plans to improve farm tenancy sector

Survey responses must be submitted by October 20
Survey responses must be submitted by October 20

The option to trade farm tenancies on the open market, powers to force badly behaved landowners to sell their holdings and plans to base rents on the productive capacity of a farm were among the proposals put forward by the agricultural holdings legislation review group yesterday.

The results of a year-long study of Scottish farm tenancy legislation came to a close yesterday with the review group putting forward 49 recommendations to improve the sector.

Farm Minister Richard Lochhead, who chaired the review group, said: “This is a once-in-a-generation review with wide-ranging and radical recommendations aimed at ensuring a secure and vibrant future for the sector.

“Some of these proposals relate to right to buy and are intended to provide tenants with a solution to escape the clutches of bad landlords, but for the vast majority of landlords, who have positive relationships with their tenants, these recommendations will pose no threat.”

In a statement to the Scottish Parliament he said there had been a 42% decrease in the amount of tenanted land in Scotland since 1982.

Despite calls to give farmers on secure 1991 Act tenancies the absolute right to buy their holding, the review group has ruled this out. Instead it has proposed powers for 1991 Act tenants to apply to the Scottish Land Court to force the sale of the holding where a landlord does not meet their obligations.

Other proposals included in the 49 recommendations are plans to appoint a tenant farming commissioner and steps to widen succession rights for 1991 Act and Limited Duration Tenancies (LDTs).

There are also proposals to allow tenants to convert their secure 1991 Act tenancy into a new long duration modern LDT with a minimum term of 35 years, and then able to transfer the tenancy to anyone on the open market for value.

Mr Lochhead also revealed proposals to create apprenticeship opportunities for new entrants, in a bid to help both retiring tenants and new entrants.

Meanwhile, the way in which 1991 Act rents are set could be changed to be based on the productive capacity of the holding.

This would be based on the holding being farmed by a hypothetical tenant “who is an efficient and experienced farmer of adequate resources who will make best use of the land” using the fixed equipment provided by the landlord.

The rent would also take account of the budget for the holding and include the contribution from non-agricultural diversified enterprises.

The proposals were broadly welcomed by industry, although landowners’ body Scottish Land and Estates warned that allowing secure 1991 Act tenancies to be converted to 35-year LDTs could be of damage to landowners’ property rights.

The Scottish Tenant Farmers Association said the group had made a “grave error” by not supporting the absolute right to buy.

Chairman Christopher Nicholson said: “There is no doubt that on becoming owner occupiers, tenanted businesses invariably grow and prosper.”

NFU Scotland joined both organisations in calling for the proposals to be implemented as soon as possible. Mr Lochhead said the report would be discussed by government, and where possible some of the proposals would be included in the Land Reform Bill which is currently under consultation.