Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Political row erupts over Countesswells housing

An outline of the planned development area at Countesswells near Aberdeen
An outline of the planned development area at Countesswells near Aberdeen

Two leading members of Aberdeen City Council’s ruling administration have clashed publicly over plans for a £700million “new community” at Countesswells.

Labour finance convener Willie Young and his Conservative coalition partner Ross Thomson were at odds after the Tory member voted against the application for 3,000 new homes on the western outskirts of the city.

Mr Thomson was one of several councillors who raised concerns about the lack of infrastructure in place at present to cope with a major increase in traffic expected from the development.

Artist impressions of the Countesswells development
Artist impressions of the Countesswells development

However, Mr Young said it was “disappointing” that a Conservative councillor – and a member of the administration – had voted against “hundreds of millions of investment in the city”.

Hazlehead, Ashley and Queen’s Cross ward member Mr Thomson has also opposed the £107million Marischal Square scheme for the former council HQ.

Mr Thomson defended his decision last night, and said it was unfortunate that his Labour colleague was “trying to politicise planning”.

He said: “There should be no politics in planning.

“I looked at everything in detail and listened to what people said.”

The spat reflected a wider division among councillors largely serving the west end of the city and others who were in favour of the Countesswells development from a consortium headed by north-east businessmen Stewart Milne and Ian Suttie.

Deputy council leader Marie Boulton moved against the plans at Wednesday’s full council meeting. She stressed she was not anti-development, but argued the local road network was “inadequate” to cope with such an influx of homes.

Yesterday, Mr Thomson said it would lead to “gridlock” on city streets.

He said: “There is huge concern locally at the western end of the city.

“It is about infrastructure, and how our roads are going to cope. We just don’t have things in place like the AWPR, the third Don crossing and the Haudagain improvements.

“People just cannot fathom that we are continuing to develop without getting the roads right first.”

Mr Thomson advocated improvements at the Hazlehead roundabout at the junction of Queen’s Road and Kings Gate, along with further junction upgrades at Springfield Road and Countesswells Road.

Liberal Democrat Martin Greig, meanwhile, suggested local communities around Hazlehead and Craigiebuckler did not believe they had been properly consulted.

Planning committee convener and Labour councillor Ramsay Milne said the development was “ambitious and achievable”, delivering schools, healthcare facilities, employment land and 735 affordable homes.

The point was also made that the Countesswells “new community” – about seven miles west of the city centre – would be phased in over a period of 15 years.

Further detailed planning applications will come before the council for the road access proposals.

The Stewart Milne Group (SMG) said the development would help with “long-term economic and social sustainability” of the city.

Paul Mulholland is property director for Heron Property, the third partner in the project which has put forward an alternative access road plan without the backing of SMG and Mr Suttie.

He said: “We are clearly pleased that a considerable number of councillors in the debate raised concerns over the current road access arrangements and noted that Heron Property is bringing forward a significantly improved solution.

“This will ensure that the development meets the full requirements, not only of those living there, but also of the local communities who have raised concerns over the currently proposed access arrangements.”