Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Leading witness for opposition gives evidence as Coul Links inquiry enters day 13

Representatives of the Coul Links public inquiry   and the two Scottish Government reporters on the earlier site visit.
Picture by Sandy McCook.
Representatives of the Coul Links public inquiry and the two Scottish Government reporters on the earlier site visit. Picture by Sandy McCook.

The leading witness for the opposition group to the proposed Coul Links championship golf course development took to the stand yesterday as the government led public inquiry entered its 13th day.

Dr Tom Dargie, an independent environmental scientist and chairman of the Not Coul group, provided evidence at a packed Carnegie Hall in Clashmore, as around 40 members of the public gathered to witness the day’s events unfold.

The Not Coul chairman’s evidence was based upon the impacts a development at Coul would have on ecology, hydrology and ecohydrology.

Witness tells Coul Links public inquiry that proposed plans are not flood-proofed

Dr Dargie said: “The applicant’s environmental work for this proposed golf course at Coul Links is deficient.

“It has failed to recognise the changing nature of the site and the drivers of that change.

“A golf course within Coul dunes will only exacerbate, greatly, the negative changes which are occurring.”

Questions were put to Dr Dargie relating to allegations made by applicant’s witnesses during their evidence sessions regarding his work, with the Not Coul chairman refuting these claims.

Dr Dargie said: “My work is done carefully, vigorously and I hope fairly, in the sense that what I find, I had to report on.”

Ailsa Wilson QC cross-examined Dr Dargie during yesterday’s afternoon session, questioning the ethics of his evidence as he stated he was providing evidence as an independent environmental scientist and this did not conflict with his role as part of the Not Coul group.

Reference was made to the two objections Not Coul submitted in relation to the proposed development, which Dr Dargie had been involved in bringing together.

Ms Wilson also questioned Dr Dargie’s failure to consider the findings of experts on behalf of the applicant that suggested alternatives to his findings, instead, setting these aside, which Dr Dargie agreed he had done.

Coul Links site visit as inquiry postponed

Ms Wilson said: “That doesn’t suggest impartiality. That doesn’t suggest that you reflected on that evidence and then went away and checked on things.

“What it indicates is that, in your mind, you are right, as you are the most experienced there in dune habitat, and that it was inconceivable to you that younger ecologists and surveyors from Alba Ecology could come to a different view that was correct.”

Dr Dargie responded: “I have sufficient information that I am very sure that my judgement, in the majority of my cases, is correct.”

The cross-examination of Dr Dargie resumes today at 9am.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]