Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

North Sea chopper forced to drop to 300ft… after air traffic controller failed to mention plane was flying nearby

Industry news
Industry news

A North Sea helicopter pilot who feared he would collide with a plane was forced to take evasive action – after a “relatively new” air traffic controller failed to tell him it was flying nearby.

The EC225 pilot said he was “surprised” to see the aircraft so close by after being told that there was nothing in his vicinity.

It has emerged that the “inexperienced” controller believed the radio operator on a North Sea oil platform would have informed both pilots of their proximity to one another instead.

The incident, which took place on July 23, was the subject of an investigation by the UK Airprox Board.

The offshore pilot had been on his way to the Britannia Platform, situated around 130 miles north-east of Aberdeen.

Meanwhile, a BA146 plane was travelling in a north-westerly direction at a low level.

When the plane came into view, the helicopter pilot deemed it to be too close and quickly dropped to 300ft above sea level.

Despite his serious concerns, the board decided there was no serious risk of a crash and graded the incident at ‘C’ level, meaning there had been aircraft proximity in which no risk of collision existed.

The board’s report added: “After much debate, they decided that the cause of the incident was that the EC225 pilot had been concerned by the proximity of the BA146.

“The discussion on risk ebbed and flowed as members noted the vastly different perceptions by the pilots; ‘high’ from the EC225 pilot and ‘none’ from the BA146 pilot.

“In the end, the board concluded that both pilots had seen each other early enough that no risk of collision had existed; timely and effective actions had been taken to prevent the aircraft from colliding.”

NATS, which is responsible for the air traffic control system, held their own internal inquiry in the wake of the incident.

The inquiry found that the air traffic controller who was responsible for feeding information to both pilots was “relatively new” and assumed the platform would be responsible for letting them know what was going on in their immediate air space.

No one from the organisation could be reached for comment last night.