Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

More investment in social housing could save £1.5bn annually – study

Prioritising social and affordable housing could save money across the UK (Alamy/PA)
Prioritising social and affordable housing could save money across the UK (Alamy/PA)

About £1.5 billion could be saved each year in homelessness-related costs if social and affordable housing was prioritised across the UK with increased investment, a group of experts has said.

A report led by researchers from University College London (UCL) called for a “transformative national housing plan” to be put in place, including scrapping the right-to-buy scheme for all future social housing in England.

They estimated that a further £4 billion investment from Government annually over the next five years could be used to build 72,000 extra dwellings each year.

A report in July from the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee warned that the Government was unlikely to deliver its manifesto commitment to build 300,000 homes a year in England by the mid-2020s after a change in approach.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak decided in December to make the target advisory rather than mandatory as he looked to see off a potential Conservative backbench rebellion.

The UCL report, published on Wednesday, suggested that the extra investment its researchers were calling for could see about 100,000 homes built in total across the UK each year – breaking it down to about 80,000 in England, 11,000 in Scotland, 5,000 in Wales and 4,000 in Northern Ireland.

They suggested a mix of about half social housing for people on the lowest incomes, others priced affordably for people starting out on the property ladder, and the rest to be rented or sold at market prices to help subsidise the plan.

The report, which also had input from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, said it had estimated that overall homelessness costs come to about £6.5 billion each year for the UK – due to associated costs including to the NHS, criminal justice system and social services.

The researchers said the Government “is only providing just over £1 billion a year towards social/ affordable housing in England, resulting in only 15,000 grant-funded homes annually”, and added that too few will be social-rent homes that those on the lowest incomes can afford.

Boosting this investment by £4 billion, to a total of £5 billion annually, could therefore see an estimated saving in homelessness-related costs of about £1.5 billion, the researchers said.

The report also calls for an end to right-to-buy in England for all future social housing, arguing that this policy has contributed to “an estimated net loss of 165,000 social-rent dwellings in England over the past decade, even if one allows for the fact that there has been some new provision by, for example, housing associations”.

They suggested the other three nations of the UK are “faring better than England” with regard to provision of social housing, but that they would “clearly benefit from an increase in social/affordable housing, especially in areas with higher indices of social deprivation”.

Right-to-buy schemes ended in Scotland and Wales in recent years and are more restrictive in Northern Ireland.

The report states: “With some of the finest architects, engineers, housing directors, public health specialists, housebuilders, educationalists and creative powers; Britain’s community of makers, thinkers, designers and doers should be mobilised to put social and affordable housing at the top of their societal agendas.”

Professor Rosalind Raine, who co-authored the report, said: “The housing crisis impacts on individuals, families and communities directly and indirectly.

“It is possible to tackle the holy grail of improving everyone’s lives, with benefits accruing the fastest for the most vulnerable. Our report does not rely on polemic but on published data.

“This summarises the evidence on the health and wider social impacts, the economic costs and savings, and highlights exemplars of social and affordable housing which can feasibly be scaled nationally.”

The report came alongside the launch of the Social and Affordable Housing Initiative, a coalition led by UCL, Dolphin Living affordable housing charity and architects John McAslan + Partners, which aims to bring together “experts from multiple sectors, including architects, engineers, public health specialists, charities, as well as the public and private sector”.

The Government has insisted housebuilding remains a priority.

A spokesperson for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said: “The Levelling Up White Paper committed to increasing the supply of social rented homes and a large number of the new homes delivered through our £11.5 billion Affordable Homes Programme will be for social rent.

“We also recently laid out an ambitious long-term plan for housing that will build the quality homes this country needs, and we are on track to deliver one million new homes in this parliament.”