Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

‘Holyrood may not have enough MSPs to scrutinise security service’

Post Thumbnail

Holyrood may not be big enough to give an independent Scotland’s intelligence service the scrutiny required, according to a new report.

Academics said with only 129 MSPs, the Scottish Parliament already struggles to fill its committees.

Independence would create new policy areas requiring scrutiny and oversight, including intelligence and security, they said.

“Simply put there may not be enough MSPs to go around,” they said.

A briefing from Edinburgh University identified three main challenges for an independent Scotland.

Along with the shortage of MSPs, a second problem was that those in office “lack expertise in security and intelligence matters”, it said, which would make it difficult for them to ask the right questions.

An independent Scotland would likely work closely with the UK’s existing security and intelligence services, they said.

The briefing said given the difference in size and capability between an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK, it may be difficult for MSPs to hold the UK intelligence agencies to account in their interactions with Scotland.

The briefing raised questions about the ability of the Scottish Parliament to act as a check on the security services.

“There is little culture of the Scottish Parliament acting as a constitutional check and balance to the executive. Rather, it acts to enable and legitimise the Scottish Government,” it said.

“The Scottish Parliament committees rarely act against the government’s interests.”

The independence white paper proposes to set up a single security and intelligence service. There are no plans to increase the number of MSPs beyond the existing 129.

The academics concluded that if unchanged, the current configuration of the Scottish Parliament and its “rather subservient relationship to the executive may compound general difficulties posed by democratic oversight of secretive intelligence and security services”.

A possible solution could be based on the Norwegian, Dutch or Belgian model with a committee of non-parliamentary experts, appointed and accountable to parliament, they said.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]