Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Crucial air base jobs left unfilled

Crucial  air base jobs left unfilled

Shock new figures have revealed that almost a quarter of aircraft maintenance posts at RAF Lossiemouth have been left vacant.

Fresh safety concerns were raised last night after it emerged that the Moray base has the highest proportion of unfilled “tradesmen” posts of all the RAF’s bases.

The shortfall was made even more stark as defence chiefs confirmed they had also axed almost half of the posts at Lossiemouth in just the last three years.

Figures for April 2011 show that there were 482 of the tradesmen posts at the base, with 27 of them vacant – a 5.6% shortfall. Last month, there were just 252 of the posts left at RAF Lossiemouth – and 59 were not filled.

Moray MP Angus Robertson, who obtained the figures using parliamentary questions, branded the 23.4% gap “shocking”.

The data shows that 11.8% of aircraft tradesmen posts are unfilled across the 10 UK RAF bases, with Lossiemouth having the biggest proportion of vacancies.

There was also a 6.7% gap in RAF engineering posts, including one vacancy out of the nine required at Lossiemouth.

Defence commentator and analyst Tim Ripley said last night that the national figures were a “barometer of morale” in the RAF, and that there was a “vicious circle” whereby people quit and leave those remaining with greater workloads, prompting them to consider their own futures.

He sounded a note of caution on the high Lossiemouth figures, pointing out that it was currently being transformed from a Tornado base to a new home for more advanced Typhoon squadrons.

“The reason they are running down the people is because they are running down the aircraft,” he said. However, a recent report by the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) highlighted a “shortfall” of suitably qualified and experienced personnel in the air force.

It said that while the situation persisted, “air safety is being undermined” by work that is left incomplete, safety modification work not being progressed, poor supervision, and “inappropriate normalisation of low standards and behaviours”.

Mr Robertson, SNP defence spokesman, said: “These figures are shocking. The recent MAA annual report said there were chronic shortages and that safety is being undermined.

“It is bad enough that Westminster is making huge cuts in the numbers of these posts – leading to the position that shortages are at an historic all-time high.

“It would be hoped that even with the savage defence cuts the MoD would at least retain a bare minimum of staff – but now more than one in 10 posts are unfilled – with RAF Lossiemouth reporting the biggest shortfall in the RAF.”

The release of the figures follows concerns raised in recent months about the safety of Lossiemouth’s Tornado GR4 fighter jets, after it emerged a crash warning system was identified as far back as 1998, but is only due to be fitted later this year.

The procurator fiscal is currently deciding whether to hold a fatal accident inquiry into a crash involving two of the aircraft from over the Moray Firth in 2012, in which three crew died.

An RAF spokeswoman said: “These figures represent a brief snapshot during which new aircraft entered service, fleets increased in size with posts being created ahead of needing to be filled and while we reduced our overall number of RAF personnel.

“It is inevitable this would temporarily affect our overall figures but we still have all the people we need to carry out all operational taskings safely.”

Comment, Page 30