Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

RAF Lossiemouth concerns delay housing decision

Lossiemouth airbase
Lossiemouth airbase

Military chiefs have stepped into the row over plans to run the access road to a proposed new housing scheme past quiet cul-de-sacs.

Developer Tulloch of Cummingston wants to build 278 homes at Sunbank in Lossiemouth.

But the firm’s plans to create an access to the town’s Boyd Anderson Drive via Halliman Way and Fisher Place have been heavily criticised.

The application for the residential scheme had been due to be considered by Moray Council’s planning committee yesterday.

But representatives of the nearby RAF Lossiemouth base asked to be allowed further time to inspect the proposal.

A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said: “We are currently considering the application for a housing development near RAF Lossiemouth and the effect this may have on radar and other aerodrome safeguarding requirements relating to the station.

“RAF Lossiemouth is the quick reaction alert (interceptor) north base so maintaining the operational effectiveness of this airbase is of vital importance.”

Tulloch of Cummingston manager, John Tulloch, said last night: “We can’t go into too much detail on our discussions with the MoD, but it’s something we’re working on presently.

“We’re disappointed that the MoD has been aware of this for almost a year and only the day before the hearing decided they wanted more time to consider it.”

The Stop the Boyd Anderson Drive (BAD) Access Group has protested against the plans since they were first announced, fearing the use of two residential cul-de-sacs to access the site would “impinge on the quality of residents’ lives”.

Group member Robert Murdoch said: “It is rather frustrating that this will prolong our agony as we await a decision.

“Our future is still up in the air, but we remain confident the council have got it wrong in allowing this application to proceed as far as it has.”

A council spokesman said: “The MoD had initially indicated that it had no objection to the development, but subsequently requested more time to study the proposals.

“We apologise for the late postponement but the objectors will have the opportunity to state their case when the hearing is rearranged.”