Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Rules on petitions committee could be relaxed after just one meeting in a whole year

Alan Donnelly
Alan Donnelly

It was set up to give the citizens of Aberdeen a greater voice in the democratic decision-making process.

But a public petitions committee – backed in local election manifestos from Labour, the SNP and Liberal Democrats – has debated just one issue in the past year.

The lack of interest in the cross-party group has now prompted senior councillors to consider relaxing the rules that govern what can be considered by members.

At present, a total of 250 signatures must be collected before an issue can be heard.

An application backed by 10 local businesses would also be considered.

Matters that are subject to ongoing court proceedings are ruled out, as are issues concerning individual councillors.

Decisions taken by the local authority over the previous 12 months are not currently eligible for discussion, while any allegation that could be considered defamatory must also be disregarded.

Partly as a result of the restrictions, five pre-arranged committee meetings were cancelled in the past year because there was nothing to discuss.

So far, just a single petition, from the Aberdeen Cycle Forum on calls for a Westhill Cycle Path, has met qualifying criteria.

The matter was taken up and later referred to the council’s now-defunct enterprise, strategic planning and infrastructure committee.

At least three proposals were discounted during the course of last year, as they did not meet regulations.

Convener Alan Donnelly, a Scottish Conservative, said: “It is a little disappointing, we would certainly like to see more burning issues that are out there brought forward.

“Perhaps we are all just living busy lives and there are not major problems, I also think the referendum took up a lot of people’s energy for several months this year.

“There were a few targeted at certain councillors that were refused, they did not meet the terms of reference.

“Obviously we hope more people will come forward, but it is maybe time to look at the number of signatures required, perhaps it could be lowered.”

A public petitions committee at the Scottish Parliament requires only one signature for delivery.

There is no age limit and the request can be written in any language. The only stipulation is that the issues must be of national interest, and something that the parliament can act upon.