Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Christopher Nicholson: Regenerative farming may be way ahead

Low crop yields in 2020 have caused concern in the industry.
Low crop yields in 2020 have caused concern in the industry.

Final Defra estimates confirm the 2020 UK wheat harvest to be the smallest since 1981.

And with low yields of other crops, this means 2020 is considered by some to be the poorest UK harvest since 1976.

For the last decade we have been talking about crop yields failing to respond to advances in plant breeding.

While extreme weather played its part in both 2020 and 1976, the take home message should be that advances in technology won’t make up for the loss in soil health resulting from the intensification across much of the UK’s arable areas of crop production over 40 years.

One key soil health indicator is soil organic matter – this contains 58% carbon and produces the humus which holds soils together and provides nutrient and water-holding capacity.

Some arable soils in the UK now have organic matter levels of less than 3%, probably half of what was there when they were first cultivated.

Despite this experience, some policymakers and influencers are pointing to further intensification as a solution to our problems – their logic being that producing more from less land can reduce carbon emissions while leaving the less productive uplands for rewilding measures.

I wouldn’t be the first to say this is flawed thinking on a number of levels.

While intensification of arable and livestock systems might reduce emissions associated with production, it takes no account of what will happen to the soil carbon nor the associated impact on biodiversity in productive areas.

For the uplands, rewilding in the absence of large herbivores and their predators might not produce a satisfactory outcome.

An alternative is to stick with a pattern of farming which has worked for centuries, with the uplands producing breeding stock for mixed lowland farms, while applying the lessons from regenerative agriculture to rebuild soil health, sequester carbon and improve biodiversity.

In Scotland regenerative farming is a new concept practiced by relatively few farmers so we don’t have our own body of robust evidence, but we can learn from other countries where it has become more mainstream practice.

Recent research has found the capacity for our soils to sequester carbon is much higher than previously thought and farmers across the world are showing how to do it by applying modern thinking to grazing management and cropping techniques.

  • Christopher Nicholson is chairman of the Scottish Tenant Farmers’ Association.