Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Highland Council webcasts are axed

Post Thumbnail

Hard times will mean less public access to Highland Council meetings with committees beginning to pull the plugs on webcasts.

The newly formed Caithness area committee has reluctantly decided not to provide an online feed of future meetings in order to save the authority about £26,000 a year.

Its members are, however, weighing up the option of a fixed-camera arrangement which would give a limited recorded account of proceedings for availability online from the following day.

Alternatively, it is also considering a sound-only option to be made available online the next day.

The other seven area committees, yet to meet this year, will face the same dilemma and must decide for themselves at their forthcoming gatherings whether to follow suit.

Overall, it could save the council more than £200,000 per year but reduce access to the decision making process.

That said, viewing figures for the meetings are notoriously low.

On average, only 28 people watch live broadcasts of the council’s area committee meetings and only 55 view the archived version.

In terms of strategic committees, the most watched webcasts last year were full council meetings which attracted an average of 139 viewers of the live transmission and 130 for the archive version.

Caithness committee chairwoman Gillian Coghill said: “We decided it was far too expensive to webcast. We felt that in an era of austerity why would we waste money.

“Some of the members felt there should be a webcast, but only two. The other eight said not in this era where we’re trying to find savings.

“If people are interested enough, once the agenda is printed on the web and there’s something really emotive to them, come along. We’ll be more than happy to accommodate you.”

She added: “If things changed, we would certainly review it. But at the moment we felt the money would be ill spent on something that attracts maybe 17 viewers. You’re not meeting a public demand.

“It’s frustrating, but I’d rather keep officers on the ground than see my face on a webcast.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in