Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial power line scheme through Moray countryside could level 6,600 acres of woodland

An artist impression of what the 78ft poles will look like at Milltown of Auchindoun.
An artist impression of what the 78ft poles will look like at Milltown of Auchindoun.

Forestry chiefs and an energy giant are on a collision course over controversial plans to build a power line through the Moray countryside.

Building the 14-mile link from the Dorenell wind farm to the Blackhillock substation near Keith is expected to involve felling more than 6,600 acres of woodland.

The local authority has already questioned why cables cannot be buried underground and Marine Scotland has raised fears about the impact on fish in nearby rivers.

The new line would ultimately connect the turbines scheme south-west of Dufftown to the National Grid.

But Forestry Commission Scotland has delivered a scathing verdict on Scottish and Southern Energy Networks’ (SSEN) proposals.

The agency has made seven recommendations and highlighted 12 areas for further discussion in a letter to the Scottish Government, which will decide the fate of the plans.

The Forestry Commission has raised concerns about the lack of tree replanting offered by SSEN and the impact on the economy.

There are also worries the width of the corridor of woodland which will have to be levelled exceeds national guidelines, with no justification.

SSEN has already faced calls to consider running the cables underground – including from Moray MSP Richard Lochhead – but insists the move would be too costly.

Last night a Dufftown bed and breakfast owner also raised the spectre of tourists being put off returning to the area to enjoy its natural beauty as the power line would pass within a mile of the village.

Alistair Jeffs said: “The reason people come here is to enjoy the view. Yes, whisky is a big draw but while they are here most of our guests go walking.

“This is going to desecrate our woodland. There’s been a gradual chipping away at the landscape with developments.

“Power lines could be one of the worst because they stretch so far. It’ll get to the point where people won’t come back.

“I think underground cables are worth the small extra cost on our electricity bills. If it means preserving the area and encouraging people to go walking on the Cabrach then it’s a price worth paying.”

Ian Cowe, development officer for the Forestry Commission in Grampian, called for “rapid discussion” with SSEN to address the issues.

He said: “Scotland’s woodlands and forestry are an economic, as well as environmental, asset. There is a strong presumption in favour of protecting Scotland’s woodland resources.

“A new power line can achieve significant public benefit, but Forestry Commission Scotland expects that when transmission companies identify route corridors, they aim to minimise environmental impact and where feasible avoid areas of woodland and forestry.

“The location of high value woodland to be permanently removed should be mapped and detailed justification for any woodland removal should be produced.”

Mr Cowe warned he Forestry Commission could not recommend the project for approval in its current form.

Engineers will use a helicopter to drop 135 of the 78ft electric poles into position to carry the cables to the 59-turbine windfarm, which is due to be completed in 2018.

A spokesman for SSEN said the firm had held detailed discussions with Forest Enterprise Scotland before submitting the application.

He said: “We understand that the conservancy division of Forestry Commission Scotland, which is responsible for forestry and woodland-related policy, was not aware of these discussions until formal consultation took place on our application.

“Members of our project team have met the relevant officials to discuss our proposals, and we are developing design amendments which we are confident will address the issues raised.”