Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Moray campaigners take measures against road plans

John Hamilton and Robert Murdoch
John Hamilton and Robert Murdoch

Campaigners believe they may have the measure of construction firm in a bitter row over a housing scheme access road.

Tulloch of Cummingston was forced to go back to the drawing board after its initial plan for getting traffic in and out of the 261-home development in Lossiemouth provoked a storm of protest.

But its revised proposals for the project at the town’s Sunbank area are also under fire because the chosen route would mean heavy vehicles passing quiet cul-de-sacs to reach the port’s Boyd Anderson Drive.

But members of a local pressure group believe they have found a way to force the developer into a second rethink.

The Stop the Boyd Anderson Drive (BAD) Access Group claim the carriageway at Halliman Way which the company hopes to incorporate into the route is not wide enough to be used as an access – as it measures only 16.6ft.

They say that, according to legislation, the road would need to be 18ft wide.

One of the group’s most committed campaigners, Robert Murdoch, took to the streets of Lossiemouth with a tape measure get proof the carriageway was not up to scratch.

He said last night: “This is a godsend as it means the developers should not be able to use the road – this should rule it out.

“Using Halliman Way as an access road is completely outwith Moray Council’s plan and now they surely can’t permit this application.

“If developers were to widen that road then there would not be room for a footpath, and this is not how the route is shown on the revised plans.

“It’s totally ouwith the normal standard for roads of this type.

“We accept that there is a need for housing, and are not against the project, but this is a major development for Lossiemouth and to go about it in this way is an utter disgrace.”

But Tulloch of Cummingston believes that although the route is not than the standard width, Moray Council planners should support its proposals.

The Elgin-based firm’s managing director, John Tulloch, said the narrow carriageway could actually be a positive traffic calming measure.

And he said the firm was not to blame for miscalculating the size of the road.

He said: “The ordnance survey map incorrectly showed the road as slightly wider than it actually is.

“But it should still be wide enough for accommodating additional traffic.

“Many modern developments have access roads that narrow down considerably less than the 18ft that is classed as standard.

“This can actually help to calm traffic, as it forces vehicles to adjust their speed – especially when it’s narrowed to such an extent that it prevents movement in one direction.”

The company said it would not undertake any work to widen any access route for use by larger vehicles.

The decision on whether to permit the route on to Boyd Anderson Drive through Halliman Way and Fisher Place will be made by Moray Council.

A council spokesman said: “As with any application, all relevant factors will be taken into consideration in coming to a decision.”

If the access road plans are given approval the Stop the Bad Access Group will examine ways of appealing against the decision.