Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans for new homes in Moray coastal town given green light

John Lally, Gillian Priestley, Robert Murdoch and Paul Brown outside Moray Council HQ. Picture by Gordon Lennox
John Lally, Gillian Priestley, Robert Murdoch and Paul Brown outside Moray Council HQ. Picture by Gordon Lennox

Plans  for nearly 300 new homes in a Moray coastal town have finally been approved – despite mass local opposition to the “absurd” access road.

The development in the Sunbank area of Lossiemouth has been the subject of huge debate since it was first tabled three years ago.

However, the majority of residents fighting the Tulloch of Cummngston application have not been opposed to the housing estate itself – but the access to it.

They were furious at the proposals to use adjacent cul-de-sacs Halliman Way and Fisher Place, which run into Boyd Anderson Drive.

Campaigners – who formed The Stop the Boyd Anderson Drive (Bad) Access group – argued that adding vehicles from 261 households onto the road would turn it into a “dangerous rat run”.

They instead want the routes to stem from the main A941 road into Lossiemouth from Elgin, and the B9135 Murton Road.

And yesterday, protesters and community council members pleaded with Moray Council’s planning committee to reject the scheme on behalf of 63 objectors and 403 petition signatories.

In nearly three hours of submissions, they described using Boyd Anderson Drive as an alternative to the A941 as “absurd”, “dangerous” and a “travesty of fairness and justice”.

The A941 had originally been considered as one of two required access points, but Tulloch of Cummingston manager John Tulloch said yesterday the idea was dropped as the development of the junction was “economically unviable”.

He told councillors it may become a possibility in the future if another developer decides to connect Sunbank Park to the artery road, however, that was “out of their control”.

Councillor Mike McConachie proposed a “compromise” with a motion to support the scheme, on the condition that no construction traffic be allowed to use the Boyd Anderson Drive route during building work, which was seconded by council convener Allan Wright.

But Councillor Douglas Ross shared the views of objectors that the Boyd Anderson Drive access was “inadequate” and moved to reject the scheme because the A941 had been ruled out.

The tense vote came back five a piece, with committee chairman Chris Tuke eventually using his casting vote to push it through.

Afterwards, Mr Tulloch welcomed the decision and said: “It has been a long day, and stressful as well, but we’ve got the decision we hoped we would get.

“Albeit, the last-minute condition will make it extremely difficult to develop that first stage of development.

“But, ultimately, we are able to move on with the project, which we are happy about.

“It’s been a long journey. It’s been probably three or four years since we started this process, so it is good to finally get there.”

But dejected campaigner Robert Murdoch hit out at the manner in which the decision was reached.

He said: “We are very, very disappointed, particularly as it was so close.

“I think that the concept of Moray Council’s planning department fell apart today.

“How can they set out a local development plan which they spent two years bringing together, then just turn it over in this way and approve this development against all the opposition of the people of Lossiemouth?”