Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Buchan village plans resubmitted hours after councillors refuse them

The planned Stuartfield development
The planned Stuartfield development

The expansion of a Buchan village may yet go ahead after the proposals were resubmitted to authority planners – just hours after it was refused.

The bid to build 19 new houses in Stuartfield by Fraserburgh-based developer Colaren Homes had collapsed on Tuesday amid concerns over road safety.

But last night, the agent for the project, Kevin O’Brien, said he was confident that this “technicality” could be overcome with the new application.

He said: “There was a political will to actually see it approved but we’re having to resubmit it,” he said.

“It’s back in and we expect a positive decision in a couple of months time. It was a mere technicality that unfortunately could not be resolved.”

It had been hoped that the widening of the road could be covered in a separate planning application before work commenced on building the homes. This was not, however, considered competent by planning officers who advised that the plans should be rejected.

The new bid was submitted on the same day that the original was thrown out.

The development, on land next to Knock Street, could now create as many as 75 new homes over the next decade as part of a larger 23-acre master plan programme for the village if approved.

It was widely supported by councillors at the last meeting of the Buchan Area Committee.

During that meeting, Stuartfield councillor Jim Ingram said that a solution was “close”.

“We are fairly close to being able to resolve this – I think an agreement can be reached, but we just need a little bit of time.

“It’s acceptable all-round and I am perfectly in favour of housing applications. I’m just concerned that it rolls on for more than two cycles (of area committee meetings) because we’re talking about people’s jobs,” he added.

Meanwhile, Councillor Norman Smith suggested that the process had been an “unfortunate thing from the word go.”