Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scottish independence: Court dismisses bid for referendum ruling

Nicola Sturgeon indyref2

A legal bid to establish whether Holyrood has the power to hold a second independence referendum without permission from Westminster has been dismissed as “hypothetical, academic and premature”.

Independence campaigner Martin Keatings argued voters should know the correct legal position before voting in May’s Scottish Parliament elections and sought backing for his view that MSPs already have the power to call such a vote.

In a 72-page opinion, Lady Carmichael said Mr Keatings lacked the standing to bring the case to the Court of Session but did not rule out the question of whether Holyrood has the power to unilaterally hold a referendum returning to court at a later stage.

The dismissal of the case will come as a blow to independence campaigners but was widely anticipated, including by Mr Keatings himself, who stated he always expected the case to end up in the appeals court in the Inner House.

A routemap to a referendum

Lady Carmichael’s ruling suggests that even if the case is not conclusive in the Inner House or Supreme Court, judges may still be asked to rule on the legality of any future referendum bill passed by the Scottish Parliament against the wishes of Westminster.

The 1998 Scotland Act that paved the way for devolution states the Union is a matter reserved to London but some academics have argued MSPs could hold a non-binding consultatory ballot on independence.

referendum court
Yes campaign supporters in George Square, Glasgow, as ballot papers for the Scottish independence referendum were counted through the night in 2014.

The SNP is expected to ask Westminster to transfer the necessary powers if it wins a predicted majority in May but prime minister Boris Johnson has repeatedly rejected calls for a second ballot.

SNP bosses published last month an 11-point routemap to a new vote that sets out how MSPs would pass their own referendum bill and dare the UK Government to challenge it in court if requests continue to be denied.

Lady Carmichael’s ruling

In her ruling on Friday, Lady Carmichael said the lack of concrete referendum legislation left the court unable to rule, but added: “I would have reached the same conclusion even if a draft bill were available for consideration.”

She went on: “It is, however, important, that matters which may properly be the subject of political debate and campaigning in the democratic process are permitted to unfold and be worked out in the political process, and that the courts intervene only when they need to do so to fulfil their function as guardians of the rule of law.

“The courts will clearly intervene to determine allegations of unlawfulness.

“Where, however, there is no allegation of unlawfulness, and the court is asked for a determination as to the state of the law in an area which is the subject of current political debate and controversy, it will be important to ensure that the question of whether an answer is required in order to protect the rule of law is addressed with rigour.”

‘Off to the Inner House we go’

Responding to Lady Carmichael’s decision, Mr Keatings said the ruling was “highly appealable” and does not represent a “silver spike through the heart”.

“While she may have dismissed the case on the hypothetical, academic, premature, it is clearly done on a neutral basis, and indeed in keeping with other cases of this nature,” Mr Keatings said.

“As I have said many times before, it is very unusual in this type of litigation to get an opinion in the Outer House and it almost always ends up in the Inner House.”

referendum court
A pro-independence group waving saltires on Arthur’s Seat, Edinburgh.

Mr Keatings also hit out at the timing of the release of the SNP’s 11-point plan, which he said had been “conveniently delivered to the public after the hearings” and left Lady Carmichael without “all the information she required to rule”.

“What we need now is a referral to a higher authority and that comes in the form of the Inner House of the Court of Session, and, as I said before, this was the expected next step – we’re in better shape than we thought we would be,” he said. “So, I’ve already instructed that process to commence and it’s off to the Inner House we go.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in



More from the Press and Journal Scottish politics team

More from the Press and Journal