Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Jamie Stone: Far too much buck-passing when it comes to delivery charges

Jamie Stone MP
Jamie Stone MP

The other day a constituent came to see me about a teensy little parcel containing two little batteries that he nearly ordered online.

When he saw it was going to cost him £10.95 for it to be delivered to the Highlands, as opposed to £4.95 for the rest of the UK, he quite understandably decided not to place the order.

Oh boy, aren’t we sick of all this!

Resolver – an organisation which looks at the problems upper most in the public’s mind – confirmed to me that in the UK, delivery charge rip-offs are the second biggest irritation people complain about – second only to online shopping.

We’ve all done it, click click – “ooh I fancy that – nice shoes – that would be useful in the kitchen”; what with the pandemic, ordering online is a real boon.

That is until you look at the small print and smell a very much deceased rat when you see the cost of delivery to where we, readers of this newspaper, actually live.

It wasn’t always like this. As long ago as January 9 1840 the ‘Penny Post’ was introduced. This world-beating innovation meant that a letter arrived anywhere in the UK from the Shetland Islands to Cornwall via Kinlochbervie and London for precisely one penny.

No one was disadvantaged because of where they lived. Wonderfully, it was the same for a parcel. Okay, a heavier one cost more than a light one, but it didn’t matter where it was coming from or going to. It was a flat and fair rate.

Now my constituent’s batteries are the perfect example of an unfair extra charge being levied on people simply because of where they live.

How very different from the high-minded ethos that led our Victorian forbears introducing the ‘Penny Post’. Quite simply the present situation stinks and I am sick and tired of going on about it.

There is far too much buck-passing when it comes to this. The Scottish Government says that delivery charges are a matter reserved for Westminster and while it is very regrettable, and while they wave a finger or two about it, the fact is that it is indeed up to Westminster to sort it out.

But then at the drop of a postman’s hat, Westminster is only too keen to burble on about market forces and how really it’s up to the Scottish Government to improve transport links and reduce the price of getting stuff from A to B.

There’s some truth to that as well! But it does make you wonder: how the hell they ever did it in 1840, long before the present transport infrastructure that we have today was in place. But do it they did.

Amidst the buck-passing, we are still where we are today. Whopping great charges that people cannot afford, particularly during the present COVID pandemic, when we rely heavily on online orders.

So what is to be done?

Both Governments want to extract various digits, as the late Duke of Edinburgh might have said, and get together, stop bickering about the union and who does what, and just sort the ruddy problem out.

Secondly they must sort out our roads and properly invest in our transport infrastructure. This in turn leads me into another suggestion: local delivery firms in the Highlands are up and down our roads all the time – they know where the bad potholes are, and they also know where a particular Mrs Mackay lives in Sutherland.

Legislation must be put in place obliging companies not using the Royal Mail for delivery to use local firms. The national firms have a worryingly high level of wrong or lost deliveries and going local will help solve this problem.

Finally this: the Royal Mail has a public service obligation – by law – and I believe that the law of the land should be changed so that the same standard of service is forced upon all other delivery companies and the firms that seek to use them.

“£10.95 for a delivery of two batteries? You have to be joking!”. This is what I said in a debate, in my own name, in the House of Commons this week.

It’s not the first time I’ve gone on the record about this issue, but I sincerely hope that one day, as soon as possible, we will see deeply unfair delivery surcharges confined to the dustbin of history.

Already a subscriber? Sign in