Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

SNP changing tack on gene editing

CHANGING TIMES: The SNP’s Fergus Ewing has accepted there are differences between gene editing and genetic modification.
CHANGING TIMES: The SNP’s Fergus Ewing has accepted there are differences between gene editing and genetic modification.

A strong indication that the SNP is changing its policy on the use of gene editing (GE) was flushed out at an NFU Scotland (NFUS) hustings ahead of the Scottish Parliamentary elections.

Until now the SNP has publicly branded GE a form of genetic modification (GM), but Fergus Ewing – who hopes to be reelected and resume his role as Rural Economy Secretary – told the meeting he accepted there was a difference between the technologies and “we should keep a watching brief on science”.

He added: “This is moving very rapidly in the EU so we shouldn’t shut our ears or eyes to  scientific advancement which is taking forward matters which could be beneficial, but we have stressed our policy is to keep Scotland GM-free and have the reputation which comes from that.”

SNP farming spokesman, Fergus Ewing.

The SNP’s change of tone appeared to came as a surprise to the Scottish Conservatives agriculture spokesman, Jamie Halcro Johnston, who went on to say he supported the adoption of GE in agriculture.

“We need to be led by the science and have confidence in our science and research community,” he said.

“There are so many challenges with food production and dealing with some of the pests,  and if we have an opportunity to do that safely we need to support (GE) but be led by the science.”

Scottish Conservative farming spokesman, Jamie Halcro Johnston

Scottish Labour spokeswoman Rhoda Grant said using GE to produce blight-resistant crops would make a huge difference to world hunger.

However she added: “We need to be careful because our reputation in Scotland is for good high quality food so we can’t afford to lose that.”

The Scottish Greens spokeswoman Mags Hall pointed out her party was opposed to GM but recognised the distinction with GE and was broadly supportive, while Catriona Bhatia of the Scottish Liberal Democrats said any new technology would have to carefully sold to the general public .

Rhoda Grant of Scottish Labour.

The meeting was attended by just over 100 NFUS members, and many of the questions focused on how the political parties would require farmers to respond to climate change targets – in particular if they would demand a reduction in livestock numbers.

Catriona Bhatia  said her party wouldn’t focus on numbers, but would promote higher quality livestock.

“We would try and support animal welfare, payments through agri-environment  schemes and woodland planting, and find local routes to market for livestock rather than export,” she added.

“We would also like to see government  drive demand for local produce.”

Catriona Bhatia of the Scottish Liberal Democrats.

Mags Hall said taking a blanket approach to livestock and cutting numbers by a specific amount wouldn’t automatically result in emissions savings.

She added: “There may be some areas where livestock production is too intensive and having a damaging effect on an ecosystem, and its about producing a plan to use that land in a better, more sustainable way. But then there are other areas where the land capacity  for livestock might be higher.

“We know we need to be eating less meat for the health of the planet, but a huge amount of that cut can come from  low-quality imported meat. We need to make sure people know what that produce is, how get it, and use it in public procurement.”

Mags Hall represented the Scottish Greens.

Fergus Ewing used the platform to dismiss recent rumours of a Scottish Government plan to cull 300,000 cattle as a means of tackling emissions.

“There’s no way as farming minister I’d preside over a mass cull of hundreds of thousands of  cattle,” he insisted.

“Would that stop people eating meat? No, it would just be imported from other countries, so that’s a wrong-headed view. We would follow the advice set out in the Suckler Beef report which is to improve farming  practices.”

However Mr Ewing pointed out that in exchange for providing direct income support to produce food, an SNP government would also require farming emissions to be reduced.

Rhoda Grant said rather than removing livestock from grassland, which could be detrimental to carbon sequestration, it was time to look at meat labelling so people could understand the difference between grass-fed and intensive production.

The hot topic of species management, and how individual parties would tackle conflict between conservation and agriculture, heard Jamie Halcro Johnston call on NatureScot to find ways of managing problems through compensation;  Mags Hall said the agency had been “trigger-happy” in its approach to the control of beavers; Rhoda Grant criticised the “arrogance” of those who didn’t believe the issues faced by farmers and crofters and said there should be better management of species; and Fergus Ewing said the issues were very real but called for “less heat and more light”, particularly from those on the extremes.

The reintroduction of the white tailed sea eagle has caused issues in some farming areas.



Already a subscriber? Sign in