Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Flood protection scheme in Huntly could protect A920 and A96

Post Thumbnail

Two major north-east roads could be protected from future flooding if a £2.9million scheme goes ahead, it was claimed yesterday.

Aberdeenshire Council wants to strengthen flood defences in Huntly to protect homes, businesses and farm land along the River Deveron and the Meadows and Ittingstone burns.

The authority’s proposals include raising and strengthening existing defences on the river between the Bridge of Gibston and the Hill of Haugh, building culverts and creating storage for flood water by constricting the flow in the Meadow Burn.

But two local landowners have objected to the scheme, and at a public inquiry yesterday their concerns were considered by Scottish Government reporter Michael Cunliffe.

Retired chartered surveyor John Rhind, of Milton of Castleton, stressed that he had always been “wholeheartedly supportive” of the need for a flooding protection scheme, but was worried one of his fields would become a reservoir.

And Neil Duncan, of Ittingstone, lodged concerns in absentia that the water storage unit would bring flood water close to his steading.

William Murdoch, Aberdeenshire Council’s projects manager told Mr Cunliffe: “It (the water storage) is of benefit to Mr Rhind in that it holds back water and reduces the overflow that would be in his neighbouring fields to the east, and holdback and limit the amount of flooding on the A920 Huntly-Dufftown road and the A96 trunk road.

“It does have a detrimental impact on Mr Duncan’s fields. The storage system could be removed from the scheme but it would then be detrimental to Mr Rhind and the highways infrastructure.

“That’s not the solution we would prefer.”

Mr Rhind discussed concerns about the debris that flows down the Meadows burn, and questioned what would happen if three trash screens in the culvert got blocked.

He said: “A feature of the previous flooding in Huntly in 1995 and 2009 was the debris and trash that comes down Meadows burn.

“Flooding will be far greater than these plans show. The point is that my field is going to be used as a reservoir.”

Mr Murdoch and engineering consultant Huw Richards, of Atkins, accepted there would be standing water in the field.

However, Mr Murdoch made assurances that regular maintenance and checks would be carried out on the trash screens.

Mr Cunliffe will now consider the evidence before making a recommendation to the council about whether it should push on, amend or scrap the scheme.

If given the final tick of approval, the earliest work would start is September and it would take six to eight months.