Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Oil worker guilty of “campaign of abuse”

David Cox
David Cox

An oil executive has been found guilty of abusing women during a 24-year campaign of terror – but insisted last night that he was actually the victim.

David Cox was convicted of four charges of violent against a former girlfriend and his wife of more than 20 years.

He battered, punched and throttled them “without warning”.

A jury at Aberdeen Sheriff Court also found him guilty of terrorising another women when she was just a child – seizing her by the throat, striking her on the head, dragging her along the ground and threatening her with a bayonet.

Cox’s wife, Corrina – who broke down during his four-day trial as she relived her fear that she might do or say something to set him off – said she was pleased justice had been done and branded him an “evil man”.

But outside court, Cox showed no remorse.

Instead, he brazenly claimed that he had been assumed guilty from the moment he first sat in the dock and that he “never stood a chance”.

The 63-year-old said the system was “heavily weighted” towards the alleged victims in domestic abuse cases – and that no one had ever asked him if he was ok.

“Nobody ever came to me and asked ‘how do you feel about this?’ The truth is I have felt suicidal at times and very depressed,” he said.

“There is no middle ground. The allegations are made and you have to try and defend them, but it’s very, very difficult.

“It’s what he said against what she said.”

During four days of emotional evidence, Cox – who address was given in court papers as 32 Woodcock Court, Stonehaven – watched and listened carefully as his ex-girlfriend and wife gave evidence against him.

His former lover, Rosemary Ringwood, who moved to the north-east to be with him in the early 1990s, said she feared she would become a “battered wife” at his hands.

But she decided that they could make things work and moved into Cox’s cottage at Glassel, near Banchory, when he landed a job with Shell.

Shortly after, he launched one of his most vicious attacks, putting his hands around her throat and squeezing as they lay in bed one night.

Miss Ringwood told the court she eventually did a “runner” following more unpredictable attacks.

But Cox played dumb when asked what could have caused her to leave him – and said he had always found it “very odd” that she ran away.

His wife wept several times as she gave evidence in court, describing the devastating impact her husband’s attacks had on her.

Cox once pushed her from a moving vehicle after a night out, and even threw her over a bin in their kitchen while she was pregnant with their first child – blaming her for hurting the baby.

He straddled and strangled her in bed in a strikingly similar attack to the one on Miss Ringwood, and even scared her so much she would escape to the woods around their house.

Mrs Cox, a 43-year-old retained firefighter who lives at Banchory, said she never left her husband because she was so in love with him, and that she desperately believed that one day his “violent outbursts” would stop.

It was only when he was arrested in summer last year following an assault at their home that she realised she had to leave him.

“He made me feel that I needed him – like I would be nothing without him,” she said.

Mrs Cox and her family, who sat through the entire trial, said yesterday that “justice had prevailed”.

But Cox said he had been wrongfully found guilty of attacks he considered to be “abhorrent”.

He added, however, that he would not be appealing against his conviction.

“I do not see any point – the jury has made its decision, and I just have to live with it and move forward,” he said.

“I’m not a law breaker. I abhor violence – it’s a horrible, horrible thing.”