Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Row over Inverness cycle path costs

Inverness Campus
Inverness Campus

PLANS for a “£1million-a-mile” cycle route in the Highland capital have been branded a waste of money by angry opposition councillors.

The path will link the new Inverness Campus with the city centre – and the local authority’s contribution to the controversial project has soared to £350,000.

The first meeting of Highland Council’s new planning, development and infrastructure committee was told the bill for just 0.7 miles of cycleway would be £733,000.

The path will run from Morrison’s supermarket along Millburn Road to Millburn Rounadabout.

The local authority had been expected to contribute £250,000 to the project but will now bear almost half the cost.

Opposition members accused the council of squandering money and senior Independent Isobel McCallum branded the path the “million-pound mile”.

Councillors had previously been told the project – mostly using existing pavement – would cost £638,000 and had approved funding of a quarter of a million pounds.

But acting head of infrastructure, Colin Howell, revealed the price rise yesterday and admitted the project was supposed to have been completed by March 31.

The council has now had to contribute an extra £100,000 from its capital programme and Carbon Clever fund.

Councillor McCallum called for the brakes to be put on the path scheme until a cheaper way of completing it could be found.

She said: “This plan has been kicked back and forwards to nearly never committee in the council in search of funding.

“I find it astonishing that we are focusing so much money and attention on this when there is much more out there that needs our attention.

“I have taken the time to measure the distance that we are talking about building a new cycle path on and it is just 0.7miles.

“I can’t help but feel that we are squandering money on this.

“If you take the cost and the distance of 0.7miles, we are talking a million pounds a mile. That’s not value for money.”

Fellow Independent, Councillor Audrey Sinclair added: “I am fully in support of the cycle route and promoting alternatives to driving.

“However, I don’t think that it warrants having this kind of money thrown at it.”

The Independent group’s comments were criticised by councillors in the ruling coalition, who voted to approve the extra money being given to the project.

SNP councillor Richard Laird said: “I believe that dedicating funding to this will represent value for money in the long run.

“Cyclists using Millburn Road in its current state run a very real risk of being hurt without a dedicated cycle lane.

“This is a good piece of forward thinking and it will be well used once it is built.”

The Independent’s bid to postpone the project failed after a 13-4 vote.

The 10ft wide cycle lane will run along Milburn Road, then through Raigmore Estate, and across the A9 via the Golden Bridge to the campus.

It has been designed to connect to a larger network which will allow cyclists to travel from the city centre to Culloden Battlefield via the existing cycle routes.

The rest the funding package is made up of £300,000 from European development money, £50,000 from developers at Inverness Campus, £23,000 from Morrison’s supermarket and £15,000 from Hitrans.

Mr Howell said: “The challenge with having a cycle lane as wide as we are proposing is that you start to intrude into the verges, the vegetation, side slopes and much more which makes it difficult to build on.

“The alternative is to lower our standards or reduce the scale and we do not want to do that.”