Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish independence: Leading businessman challenges Wood comments

Leading Yes supporter Sir Donald MacKay questions Sir Ian Wood's views on independence.
Leading Yes supporter Sir Donald MacKay questions Sir Ian Wood's views on independence.

A leading Scottish businessman has stepped in to limit the damage caused by Sir Ian Wood’s views against independence.

Professor Sir Donald MacKay said he had looked at figures for North Sea oil and gas production, and revenues and concluded that in the event of a Yes vote Scotland will be in better financial position than the rest of the UK.

The revelation by the Press and Journal’s sister website Energy Voice that Sir Ian believes the future prospects of Scots will be better served within the UK was regarded by many as a game changer in the independence debate.

While he was critical of both sides in the referendum campaign for misquoting his report on the future of the offshore sector, he accused the Scottish Government of massively overestimating North Sea reserves.

The former head of the Aberdeen-based Wood Group said production could fall away within 15 years, hitting jobs and the economy.

Sir Donald, who is an avid Yes supporter, intervened yesterday to say he disagreed with Sir Ian’s views.

A founding director of many companies and a former Scottish Enterprise chairman, he said his first source was Sir Ian’s oil review which says “a number of larger new fields are about to come on stream in the next two or three years and that could take production back to the level of two to three years ago”.

Sir Ian said similar forecasts had been made by the industry body Oil and Gas UK – which he had “taken forward through my calculations” – and Aberdeen University’s Professor Alex Kemp.

Sir Donald: said “The result in output in the first five years from 2014-15 is much greater than that anticipated by OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) who, contrary to the views of the industry, predict a continuing fall in output right through to 2018-2020.

“Therefore that is a major factor in predicting much more substantial oil tax revenues than those predicted by OBR.

“The point is that Scotland will begin life as an independent nation in a better fiscal position relative to the UK. An independent Scotland should use that financial advantage to invest in re-engineering our economy towards industrial, manufacturing and trade-able services development.

“Within this fiscal framework the Scottish Government should be able to deliver the major economic programmes contained in their white paper.”