Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Business chief says north-east ‘deserves better’ following Scottish Budget’s ‘glaring omission’ of vital £200m railway project

Post Thumbnail

An Aberdeen business leader has said the north-east “deserves better” following the Scottish Budget’s “glaring omission” of a vital £200 million railway project.

Funding was allocated to improve journey times between Aberdeen and the Central Belt as part of the 2016 City Region Deal.

But the plan to dual the line at Montrose – the only section of single track between Aberdeen and London – was not included in the government’s list of rail priorities this week, and was not mentioned in Finance Secretary Derek Mackay’s budget on Wednesday.

The blow comes after weeks of cancelled and delayed trains due to staff shortages.

Now Russell Borthwick, chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, has written to Transport Scotland demanding assurances that the scheme will still be taken forward.

Transport Scotland last night insisted partners were “committed” to reaching the right solution as soon as possible.

It follows the recent revelation that the committee overseeing the project’s implementation had gone back to the drawing board.

A rail options study showed that the original plans would not offer value for money, shaving just two minutes off each journey passing through Montrose.

In his letter to Transport Scotland rail director Bill Reeve, Mr Borthwick said the proposals were “unworkable” and would “never see the light of day”.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


He also said Mr Reeve’s attendance at last week’s city region deal joint committee meeting should have been a “milestone” for delivering sub-two-hour journey times.

Instead, north-east businesses and commuters had landed back at “square one”, he said.

Mr Borthwick added: “As a key partner in the delivery of this project, Transport Scotland must do better, and the north-east certainly deserves better.

“The region needs to see an approved plan for this investment, one which reduces rail journey times between the north-east and the Central Belt to under two hours.

“What reassurances can you provide to our member businesses that an alternative, workable plan to utilise this £200m investment will be progressed rapidly?”

North-east Labour MSP Lewis Macdonald has also vowed to query the decision to call off the plans in the Scottish Parliament.

Mr Macdonald said: “Double-tracking the East Coast line at Montrose is essential if we are to have a high-quality modern railway serving Aberdeen and the north-east.

“SNP ministers promised to sort out this pinch point on the rail network when the Aberdeen city deal was announced two years ago.

“Their officials now appear to be back-tracking on that promise.”

A Transport Scotland spokeswoman said the north-east’s rail services were already benefiting from “substantial investment,” including through this week’s timetable change and the re-doubling of the track between Aberdeen and Inverurie.

“These add up to the most significant improvement in rail services around Aberdeen for many decades.”

On the outcome of the rail options study, she said: “The consensus across the group was that further work is required to ensure best value for the public purse.

“While it is too early to say what the outcomes will be, all the partners remain committed to reaching the right solution for this significant £200million investment as soon as possible.”