Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Full fiscal autonomy for Scotland would result in 140,000 less jobs, claim Labour

The Scottish Parliament.
The Scottish Parliament.

Scottish Government demands for full fiscal autonomy will result in nearly 140,000 job losses, according to Labour.

While the Nationalist continue the fight for independence, they want Scotland to raise all the taxes it spends.

This would see the Barnett formula – used to distribute public funds across the UK – scrapped. Labour said independent analysis showed Scotland would lose between £6.5billion and £6.6billion.

Impartial experts at the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe), using the Scottish Government’s own economic model, confirmed that reducing public spending in Scotland by £6.5billion, resulting in a 5% cut in domestic product and the loss of 138,000 jobs – one in every 16.

Scottish Labour deputy leader Kezia Dugdale said: “That means massive spending cuts over and above what we would get from the Tories winning in May. Huge cuts to the budget for our NHS and our schools.

“It’s austerity on a scale never seen before in Scotland, it’s austerity max.”

When Ms Dugdale challenged the first minister yesterday, Nicola Sturgeon accused her of “scaremongering” and insisted the SNP were the only party that could prevent further public spending cuts.

Ms Sturgeon claimed “never ending” Westminster cuts would slash £14.5billion from the Scottish budget over the next five years as she accused Labour of siding with the Tories on the issue.

She added that the Barnett formula would “remain in place until such times as this parliament is in charge of our own fiscal and economic decisions”.

Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson quoted from a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) which said full fiscal autonomy would result in “substantial spending cuts or tax rises in Scotland” requiring the equivalent of a 15p income tax hike.

She said: “In the past I repeatedly asked the first minister’s predecessor to give a detailed rebuttal to IFS projections but he never did.

“I’m asking this first minister, can she tell us now in this chamber why the IFS is wrong?”

Ms Sturgeon said the IFS report was predicated on Scotland being fiscally autonomous in 2015-16.

She said: “We’re not going to have fiscal autonomy then but perhaps more fundamentally if Ruth Davidson had had the honesty to complete the IFS sentence about tax rises or spending cuts she’d find it says this, and I quote: ’unless credible policies to boost growth of Scotland’s onshore economy and revenues are developed’.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in