Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Land reform proposals could force people to sell up, claims SLE

Survey responses must be submitted by October 20
Survey responses must be submitted by October 20

Landowners body Scottish Land and Estates (SLE) has hit out at the government’s land reform proposals warning they could force some people to sell their land.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon last week pledged to embark on a “radical programme of land reform” in Scotland.

This week a consultation was launched by newly appointed environment and land reform minister Aileen McLeod (see column) over the proposals which include increasing the Scottish Land Fund from £3million this year to £10million in 2016, and removing tax breaks for sporting estates.

There are also plans to give ministers power to intervene “where the scale of land ownership or the conduct of a landlord is acting as a barrier to sustainable development”, and introducing a restriction on companies, trusts and partnerships from outside of the EU owning land.

It is also proposed that a Scottish Land Reform Commission be set up and that measures are put in place to have all the information about land ownership in one place.

SLE chairman David Johnstone hit out at the proposals and said they had failed to recognise the major social, economic and environmental contribution that estates and land-based businesses made in Scotland.

“We are now faced with the threat of landowners being forced to sell land if they are regarded as being a barrier to sustainable development,” said Mr Johnstone.

“The reality is that many landowners are the drivers of sustainable development. There needs to be much greater clarity on this issue particularly on what evidence exists to suggest this measure is necessary and in what circumstances the government thinks it is all right to force someone to sell their home and business.”

He urged government to treat the land reform proposals separately from the upcoming recommendations from the Agricultural Holdings Legislation Review Group (AHLRG), warning that the complex area of tenancy law needed separate consideration.

Bidwells partner Finlay Clark agreed and said the proposals could damage the rural economy.

He said the breaking up of large land holdings could damage the forestry sector, while the withdrawal of business rates exemptions for shooting and deerstalking could put jobs at risk.

The Scottish Tenant Farmers Association (STFA), on the other hand, welcomed the proposals and said plans to combine the AHLRG recommendations with the land reform proposals were “excellent news”.

Chairman Christopher Nicholson said:  “Tenancy reform must be considered as part of the broader land reform agenda for a more inclusive society and to increase opportunity in the wider rural economy.

“Scotland’s land and people need a better deal and land reform will unlock underutilised assets for better use by more of the population.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in