Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Campaigners against fracking urge council to follow Scotland’s lead

Fracking protesters outside Lancashire County Council in January
Fracking protesters outside Lancashire County Council in January

Anti-fracking campaigners hailed the Scottish Government’s stance on the controversial method of shale gas extraction after proposals for a site in Lancashire were recommended for approval yesterday.

Pressure group Friends of the Earth (FoE) urged councils south of the border to follow the lead of Scotland and Wales and introduce a moratorium on the development of unconventional gas extraction.

Lancashire County Council has just published reports on planning applications from shale company Cuadrilla Resources to frack two sites between Preston and Blackpool.

Planning officials are recommending that one of the applications should be approved, subject to a lengthy number of conditions being met, but the other should be turned down because of a potential increase in traffic.

The council’s development control committee is due to make decisions on both sites next week.

Cuadrilla had submitted revised plans after planning officers recommended refusal for both sites in January due to concerns about noise and traffic.

FoE campaigner Furqan Naeem said: “The council must now listen to the tens of thousands of people who have objected to fracking at both sites, and the strong evidence put before them, and reject both of Cuadrilla’s proposals to frack.

“Fracking has already been halted in Scotland and Wales because of the serious risks it poses to the environment and health, and impacts on climate change. Two-thirds of people in Lancashire want it halted too.

“Rejecting Cuadrilla’s plans is the only way to stop Lancashire’s communities and environment being made the UK’s guinea pig for risky and polluting fracking.”

Greenpeace UK energy and climate campaigner Daisy Sands said: “The decision Lancashire authorities will make next week is not about technicalities.

“It’s a stark choice between protecting their communities’ health and quality of life and working towards a clean energy future on the one hand, or sacrificing all this for the sake of an unproven and risky industry that may never deliver.”

Green Party leader Natalie Bennett said she would join “what I am sure will be huge protests against fracking” outside next week’s council meeting.

But industry body UK Onshore Oil and Gas welcomed the approval recommendation, which chief executive Ken Cronin said reflected “the hard work Cuadrilla has done to address concerns that have been raised.”

Staffordshire-based Cuadrilla said: “We will await the councillors’ decisions on both these applications at the end of June.”

The Scottish Government called a halt to fracking developments in January to allow further research and a public consultation to be carried out.

Wales quickly followed suit, despite the potential for a huge windfall from the exploitation of reserves estimated to be six times as big as the UK’s annual gas consumption.

Supporters say fracking gives the UK an opportunity to reduce its reliance on foreign imports as North Sea oil and gas supplies dwindle.

The UK Government is pushing for the development of a shale gas industry, claiming it will also create jobs and economic growth at the same time as helping to keep household energy bills down.

But critics say the fracking extraction process – injecting chemicals, sand and water into rocks at high pressure – can pollute water supplies and trigger small earthquakes. It is banned in France, while Germany is allowing it only under strict regulation and for testing purposes.