Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

New internet ruling causes dismay

Post Thumbnail

A legal ruling about privacy has left internet experts struggling to explain its implications

The European Union Court of Justice last week ruled that Google must remove links from its search results when asked to do so by a member of the public.

The case was brought by Spanish citizen Mario Costeja Gonzalez, who wanted to change the results that appear when you search Google for his name.

The court agreed and said that Google should comply with his request.

The trouble with this ruling is the precedent it sets. If anyone can insist that Google (or any other site) must remove links about them when asked, then how will that work in practice?

In particular, if someone makes such a request, how can Google be sure that they are the right person? What happens when it’s someone with a very common name?

Another problem: what happens when a disgraced public figure wants to clean up their reputation? Could this ruling allow them to effectively edit the internet to suit their own purposes?

The ruling has caused widespread dismay. Javier Ruiz, Policy Director at the Open Rights Group (, said: “We need to take into account individuals’ right to privacy but this ruling raises significant concerns. If search engines are forced to remove links to legitimate public content, it could lead to online censorship.”

The ruling says that there’s a balance to strike in every possible case. People would have to prove that the information they wanted removed was “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant”.

It’s a sign of a deeper problem: the internet is still young, but governed and controlled by old, outdated laws. Only when we have a new law that properly understands and takes account of the internet, will we properly be able to settle disputes like this.

Already a subscriber? Sign in