Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Union appeal far greater than Scottish independence ‘mirage’, claim Tories

Voters will be asked "Should Scotland be an independent country" on September 18.
Voters will be asked "Should Scotland be an independent country" on September 18.

Three former Scottish Secretaries have claimed voting for independence would be a “reckless gamble” that would result in a weaker and poorer nation.

Lord Ian Lang of Monkton, Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Lord Michael Forsyth of Drumlean said the value and the emotional appeal of the union was “far more compelling than the mirage of independence”.

Their remarks were ridiculed by SNP Finance Secretary John Swinney who claimed the No campaign had made a “major gaffe” involving Conservatives who had had a hand in introducing the poll tax to Scotland.

But the Tory grandees said the argument for separation was “built on a myth that sees Scotland as a deprived country, exploited by an uncaring neighbour”.

Lord Forsyth, who was Secretary of State for Scotland from 1995 to 1997, Lord Lang, who served from 1990 to 1995 and Sir Malcolm, who was in office from 1986 to 1990, issued a joint statement on why they thought people should vote No on September 18.

They claimed “now was not the moment for a reckless gamble and a leap into the unknown”.

The statement read: “From our knowledge gained in government, we maintain that the economic and financial case against breaking up the United Kingdom is so clear as to be unarguable.

“That any hope that with independence Scotland could achieve material or social objectives unavailable within the union is vain.

“And that the chance of Scotland maintaining in isolation the wealth and strength she enjoys as part of Britain is non-existent.

“We hold that the constitutional, financial and legal difficulties of unscrambling so integrated and successful a union as ours would be as complicated, damaging and heart-rending as breaking up any marriage can be.”

The two peers and MP asked: “Why dismantle our great success story and embark on a sea of uncertainty?”

Mr Swinney said: “The decision to draft in former Tory Scottish Secretaries is a major gaffe for the No campaign and the clearest sign possible of a campaign in utter disarray.

“These are the men who helped deliver the hated Tory Poll Tax to Scotland – something people in Scotland have neither forgiven nor forgotten.

“There could scarcely be a better argument for a Yes vote than the democratic deficit that these Tories represent.”