Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors urged to throw out scaled-back plans for retirement village

The proposed development would include 60 homes.
The proposed development would include 60 homes.

Councillors on Aberdeen’s planning committee have been urged to reject plans for a retirement village in the west of the city.

Scaled-back proposals were put forward to create the community at Binghill House in Milltimber.

Original plans included 140 homes for people over the age of 60. However, the number was later revised down to 60 flats and cottages.

Drawn up by architecture firm Halliday Fraser Munro, the proposals also include a 20-bed nursing home, shops, a cafe and allotments.

Objections to environmental impact

However, dozens of letters of objection were received by Aberdeen City Council planners, with many raising concerns about a loss of green space resulting from the retirement village.

Now council officers have recommended that the local authority’s planning development management committee reject the plans when it meets later this week.

They cited concerns over the scale of the development, and said the developers had not “demonstrated sufficient consideration” for the surrounding area.

A report reads: “The proposal would not be for purposes considered essential for agriculture, woodland, or forestry, it would not be a recreational use associated with an agricultural or rural setting and would not be associated with mineral extraction or landscape renewal.

“In addition, whilst it could be argued that the proposal is within the boundaries of an existing activity, it is not small-scale, it would significantly increase activity on site and would not be ancillary to what exists.

Plans ‘would destroy character’

“The proposal would also destroy or erode the character and/or function of the Green Space Network.

“The proposed development has not demonstrated sufficient consideration for its context and has not demonstrated an acceptable form of proposed development that respects the setting of the Category C-listed Binghill House, nor has the applicant adequately demonstrated how an acceptable level of development could be accommodated on site whilst having due consideration for its surrounding context.”

Officers also raised concerns over the possible loss of protected trees.

The retirement village plans will go before the planning committee tomorrow.

If councillors do choose to approve the development, planners have requested that they ensure it is subject to a legal agreement and a number of conditions relating to matters such as access, the appearance of buildings and a detailed ecological impact assessment.