Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors to hear petition seeking answers on Marischal square

Protestors  have repeatedly raised concerns over plans for Marischal Square
Protestors have repeatedly raised concerns over plans for Marischal Square

An Aberdeen man’s petition calling for answers on the financial arrangements made for the city’s controversial £107million Marischal Square scheme is to be heard by councillors next week.

William Skidmore hopes to convince members of the local authority’s petitions committee to reveal more details of how the 35-year sale and lease back arrangement for the development came about.

He claimed that no risk assessment was carried out to support the deal with Aviva Investors and Muse Developments, meaning the liability will rest with taxpayers.

The petition, which was launched on July 1 and closed on September 3, has attracted 424 signatures and Mr Skidmore will now have the chance to make his case to the committee at its meeting on Tuesday.

It calls for “details of the investment decision process that Aberdeen City Council followed from the initial idea to vacate St Nicholas House through to the award of contact to Muse/Aviva for the Marischal Square development that ultimately led to the council’s decision to deliver guaranteed annual lease payments to Aviva over 35 years.”

The 67-year-old former oil worker said that the financial details of the arrangement had been “shrouded in secrecy”.

He said: “The main thrust is to get the council to be open about the process they went through.

“It seems to me there was no business case made so why did they think this was such a good deal for the city?

“The council has an abysmal record of running private enterprises, so why do they think this one will be better?”

City council leaders have repeatedly insisted that the proper processes were followed and that the Marischal Square deal was struck following a democratic decision of elected members.

Several complaints made by objectors to the standards commissioner have also been rejected.

Last night committee convener councillor Alan Donnelly gave assurance that Mr Skidmore would get a “fair hearing”.

He said: “He will get time to raise his concerns on the issues of the historic decision on Marischal Square.

“This has been through the courts and everything has been done above board.

“But he will have the right to have his say on Tuesday.”