Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Expert surgeon says baby’s injuries ‘most likely’ caused by being shaken

High Court in Aberdeen
High Court in Aberdeen

An expert in child brain injuries has told a jury that a baby had “most likely” been violently shaken before being taken to hospital in a “floppy and unresponsive” state.

Babysitter Syeda Sokina Begum is on trial at the High Court in Aberdeen accused of “repeatedly” shaking an infant to the “danger of her life” while looking after her.

The 29-year-old, of the city’s Headland Court, denies harming the child – who spent almost a fortnight at Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital after being rushed there on New Year’s Day in 2017.

The trial, before Lord Uist, began last week and the jury of eight women and seven men have heard that the baby girl was treated for bleeding from the brain and eyes that evening.

Advocate depute Martin Richardson told the court that the child had shown no signs of illness earlier in the day.

Jury played ‘distressing’ 999 call during Aberdeen baby attack trial

Expert witness Dr Peter Richards, a consultant paediatric neurosurgeon, yesterday gave evidence via a video-link from Oxford and said the youngster exhibited the symptoms of “shaken baby syndrome” after being taken to hospital.

Dr Richards added: “All the abnormalities can be explained by a recent head injury, with no other explanations apparent.

“The kind of force involved would have been such that a witness would have said ‘stop, don’t do that, you will hurt the child’.

“The effects can vary between minimal injury through to fatal injury, but when these events do occur there is the potential for a very bad outcome.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


“One forceful shake can cause such injuries, however, and the evidence shows that the baby did not suffer repeated abuse.

“It was more likely to be a momentary loss of control on the part of a carer who had not planned to injure her.

“The likeliest option is that an event did occur, somebody would know about it, and they have chosen not to report it.”

The court heard that the baby involved suffered seizures during a 13-day stay in hospital afterwards, but that her condition has since improved.

Aberdeen babysitter accused of putting girl’s life in danger after ‘shaking’ the infant so hard she bled from her brain

However, Dr Richards explained that any possible lasting effects may not present themselves until the child begins attending primary school and her academic ability is measured against that of her classmates.

Defence agent Frances Connor suggested the baby’s collapse was a delayed reaction to an incident which occurred earlier in the day, before Begum took over her care.

Dr Richards said the reports he had studied indicated that the baby had been well before suddenly falling ill.

He said he “had not come across a case” where an infant who suffered a delayed collapse had appeared healthy in the hours before.

The trial is expected to conclude this week.