Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors reject 400-home Banchory development

The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory
The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory

Councillors have rejected plans for 400 homes next to a Deeside beauty spot.

Members of Aberdeenshire’s Marr area committee said the proposed development at Braehead, Auchattie, at the south end of Banchory, would create “lasting, irreversible damage” to the local area.

The plans from Turriff-based Sandlaw Farming – for 300 rented homes, 75 affordable homes and 25 assisted-living apartments, ranging from one-bedroom flats to five-bedroom houses – will now go to the full council for consideration.

Council officers had recommended the refusal of the application due to the potential impact on local wildlife and landscape, and the site’s proximity to the River Dee.

Almost 500 objections were lodged against the plans, which also included a Banchory Medical Centre and a new centre for the Deeside Way.

Banchory councillor Karen Clark said the proposed scheme, next to the Scolty woodlands, could have “lasting, irreversible damage” on the local area and its approval would “make a mockery of the planning process”.

Fellow Banchory councillor, Provost Jill Webster, declared it the “absolute worst” place for a development.

Spokesman for the Scolty Redevelopment protest group, Mike Adams, said the decision to reject the plans echoed the views of the planning department.

He added: “The committee have asked that further reasons for refusal be added to the report. These included conditions concerning the negative impact on local schools, tourism and safe routes to school.

“This would be the wrong development in the wrong place and we hope the full council also supports the view of the planning department to refuse planning permission when they vote in June.”

Sandlaw Farming development consultant Ken Ross said the firm was not defeated yet, and insisted the development was needed to bring affordable housing to some of the 15,000 people on Aberdeenshire Council’s waiting list.

“The decision was not unexpected. It is another step in a planning process that has some way to go,” he said.

“Aberdeenshire Council has no allocations in its development plans for this type of urgently-needed housing.”