Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Crown Office reveals why Merseyside Police were drafted into Kevin Mcleod case review

Kevin's parents June and Hugh Mcleod have been fighting for answers since 1997.

An independent review into the death of a man in Wick nearly 25 years ago was ordered because Police Scotland were not providing enough information, it has emerged.

The body of Kevin Mcleod was found in the town’s harbour on February 9, 1997.

His family has spent years campaigning for his death to be investigated as a murder.

Merseyside Police were asked to carry out an independent review into the case in 2019.

The minutes of a meeting between Kevin’s father Hugh and deputy crown agent Lindsey Miller have now revealed why the case review was handed to the English police force in the first place.

‘The Crown had concerns’

Having initially been told that a review was being carried out by Police Scotland and the Criminal Allegations Against the Police Division (CAAPD), Hugh asked why it was now in the hands of Merseyside Police.

Ms Miller replied: “CAAPD raised concerns with me that the police were not providing all of the information needed.

“That was then raised with the chief constable and that the Crown had concerns about this review.

“That’s why it was then sent to Merseyside to deal with.”

Allan Mcleod. Picture by Sandy McCook

Kevin’s uncle, Allan Mcleod, said the family were “stunned” by the response.

He said: “My family could never fathom why Police Scotland had invited Merseyside Police to conduct an independent review of Kevin’s death when a review by the CAAPD was still ongoing.

“It beggars belief that if the CAAPD had concerns that Police Scotland were failing – or refusing – to provide all the information they requested, then why did the Lord Advocate not intervene?

“No family in Scotland should have to fight for the truth or be treated with contempt by the authorities.”

Review findings could be made public within weeks

The Merseyside Police review has now concluded and Kevin’s family is anxiously awaiting the results.

They are likely to be made public in a matter of weeks.

It could provide some long-awaited answers.

Kevin was initially ruled to have drowned after suffering internal injuries from a fall.

Kevin’s death has remained a mystery for nearly 25 years.

At the time, local police said his death was “accidental”.

But his family always believed there was more to it.

In 2017, police chiefs finally admitted legacy force Northern Constabulary had failed by not treating the death as murder.

This was despite a specific instruction from prosecutors to do so.

Police have since apologised for failures in the handling of the case.

How have police responded to the latest revelations?

Asked to respond to Ms Miller’s comments to Kevin’s family, assistant chief constable  John Hawkins said: “The chief constable commissioned Merseyside Police to carry out this review in September 2019 and I would like to thank them for carrying out this lengthy piece of work so comprehensively.

“We will take time to carefully study the review. Our thoughts remain with Kevin’s family and friends at this time.

Assistant chief constable John Hawkins.

“As this document has now been delivered to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service we are unable to comment further.”

A spokesman for the Crown Office said “a great deal of work” has gone into the Merseyside Police review.

He added: “We are considering its contents.

“Senior prosecutors are in contact with the Mcleod family every six weeks. They will keep them informed of the progress we make.

“When we have fully considered the review we will meet with the family to discuss the findings.”