Leading figures in anti-Trump group have tenuous links with north-east

By Ryan Crighton

Published: 12/12/2009

Key figures in a vociferous pressure group trying to sabotage Donald Trump’s £1billion golf resort plans are based in the central belt and have few links with the north-east, it can be revealed today.

A Press and Journal investigation has found that many of the people running the Tripping Up Trump (TUT) campaign have tenuous or no connections with the Aberdeenshire coastline they claim to want to protect.

Ties between TUT and the more extreme Plane Stupid movement – which has targeted politicians and closed airports in the past – have also been uncovered.

TUT rose from the ashes of Sustainable Aberdeenshire, which lost all momentum following the Scottish Government’s decision to grant Mr Trump outline planning permission for his Menie Estate project.

But since bursting on to the scene earlier this year, TUT’s membership has been a guarded secret. However, details of some of the environmentalists behind the group have now emerged.

Last night a leading north-east business figure dismissed the “validity” of TUT’s campaign, while Mr Trump said he was glad its leading members were now being “named and shamed”.

Speaking from a golf course in Florida, the tycoon said his lawyers had advised to take legal action against the group.

TUT is being co-ordinated from the central belt by Glasgow-based Martin Glegg, who is originally from Banchory.

The 27-year-old graduated from Perth College with an HNC in video production in 2003 and currently works in schools in the Falkirk area doing “moving image workshops”.

He was a member of Sustainable Aberdeenshire and moved to establish TUT at the same time as the Plane Stupid protest group was drumming-up support in the north-east.

Plane Stupid, which fights against airport expansion across the UK, made headlines around the world earlier this year by dousing Business Secretary Lord Mandelson in green custard.

It is also opposing Mr Trump’s plans. In March, nine of its protesters were arrested after a demonstration at Aberdeen Airport which saw 19 flights cancelled and cost the airport and operators an estimated £1million.

Wearing wigs and golf visors, the demonstrators staged a mock game of golf with plastic clubs and balls to protest against the Trump development.

Tripping up Trump denies any links with Plane Stupid. However the Press and Journal understands that Glasgow man Jonny Agnew – one of the nine Plane Stupid activists who face a criminal trial over a protest at Aberdeen Airport – is an active member of Tripping up Trump.

The 23-year-old is understood to have been the driving force behind an anti-Trump petition which has attracted 15,000 signatures.

According to a TUT source, his Aberdeen Airport co-accused Tilly Gifford, 25, and 26-year-old Dan Glass have also attended TUT events. Both of them are also from Glasgow.

Mr Agnew confirmed that he was on Tripping up Trump’s mailing list and that he was backing the group’s cause – but denied that the groups were linked.

He said: “I get the e-mails and that, but Plane Stupid is very separate from Tripping Up Trump.”

Mr Glegg said he was unsure whether Plane Stupid members were among his ranks, but added: “In terms of the nuts and bolts of the campaign, Plane Stupid is nothing to do with us.”

Another Glasgow man, Kris McKernan, who owns and runs computer firm KMG Design, built the group’s website and has landed another job on the back of it.

Another well-known environmental campaigner, Frances McCartney, is TUT’s lawyer. She is based in Paisley. She runs Environmental Law Centre Scotland, a non-profit organisation which aims to “help community groups, individuals and the voluntary sector to protect the environment”.

She is currently representing Trump neighbour Molly Forbes, of Mill of Menie, who claims Aberdeenshire Council was wrong to allow the tycoon to start work on his championship course.

Ms Forbes’s son, Michael, is probably TUT’s most famous member. The 56-year-old has vowed that no amount of pressure from the Trump Organisation would persuade him to give up his 23 acres at Mill of Menie – a stance which has won him supporters around the globe.

Fellow Menie resident David Milne is an active member as well. The health and safety consultant is also refusing to sell his home, which is at Hermit Point.

London man Robin Parker runs the group’s Facebook social networking page, which currently has just under 1,000 registered members, or “friends” as they are referred to. Mr Parker is president of the Aberdeen University Student Association and has just finished a four-year BSc degree in geography in the city.

The 23-year-old went to the City of London School for Boys and talks about several other environmental causes on his own Facebook page, including Plane Stupid.

He has helped plan some of TUT’s events and set up the group’s merchandise website, which sells T-shirts and other TUT-branded goods.

Leeds man Danny Heptinstall, chairman of the Student Wildlife Association of Grampian, was also heavily involved in the group’s formative months. The 22-year-old Aberdeen University student has since taken a step back due to “other commitments”.

Geoff Runcie – who was leader of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce when Mr Trump’s plans were first lodged – said the business community was still behind the proposals, despite TUT’s campaign. He said the fact that so many key players in the group were not from the north-east brought the “validity” of their protest into question.

“The business community has found it frustrating that an anti-development lobby from a small minority has been getting disproportionate attention – especially when many of these people have no vested interest in the economy of the north-east.”

Reader's Comments

Personally I think that all these groups, TUT, Plane Stupid and Road Sense have no real interest in this area but their own personal ego trip. And due to the press they are getting their 15 minutes of fame.
Doug Donaldson
Report this comment

Personally I feel that all of these groups like TUT, Plane Stupid and Road Sense has no real interest in the north east but merely their own personal interests and theit ego. I feel that the press are giving them their 15 minutes of fame!
Doug Donaldson
Report this comment

Let me correct a few basic assumptions that have been made here. First there is no requirement for anyone to be local to a development to protest against it. Sometimes distance helps and no one seems to be complaining that the developer is not local either. Secondly The spread of support for TUt just goes to remind people that this development is in fact a national disgrace and should stopped at all costs because of the incredible damage this would have if it were to go ahead . Thirdly, no one, least of all myself, is anti development; what we are is anti bad development and that is exactly what this is. This is a story out of nothing sounding like the echoes of desperation
David Milne
Report this comment

I agree that a new development will create fresh employment prospects - but one which rides roughshod over planning laws, human rights and unique landscape is clearly not the right one. I am a member of TUT. I live and work in Aberdeenshire.
Jonathan Williams
Report this comment

I agree that a new development will create fresh employment prospects - but one which rides roughshod over planning laws, human rights and unique landscape is clearly not the right one. I am a member of TUT. I live and work in Aberdeenshire.
Jonathan Williams
Report this comment

It seem strange fo the P&J to be attacking the anti-Trump campaigners for not being local. The SNP Holyrood government decided that this issue if of national importance and called in the planning decision from Aberdeen Council. The Scottish Government itself has thus openly stated that the issue is far more than a local issue and by that token, it is axiomatic that the opinion of any Scottish resident is as valid as someone local to the development.
Bob Downie
Report this comment

It's all about compulsory purchase orders, environmental issues, flouting the planning laws and seedy under handed tactics from the trump organization. What’s the big deal if these people are not local we all have the right to object.
Robert Horne
Report this comment

Thanks to the P&J for exposing TUT for the charalatans that they are. I agree with your newspaper that all valid opinions should receive appropriate exposure but the exposure gained by TUT is innapropriate given that they don't even live here and have no real interest in the area. TUT are only seeking to gain notoriety on the back of Mr Trump's fame. David Milne's assumptions are his own and his statements are only his opinion and as has been proven before they are not at all based upon fact but do represent his distinct and undisputed biase against this wonderful project and Mr Trump.
Diane J Balmedie
Report this comment

Sorry Dianne, Balmedie I agree with Mr Milne, its Trump and the P&J who sound desparate, we are a democracy and anyone who cares to do so has the right to object. Anyway out of interest just what part of the NE does Trump come from and for that matter where does his legal team comr from. keep on protesting all those who wish to do so, you have my backing and most of my friends, all of whom do live in this area.
Christina Crosley
Report this comment

This is truly low, even for the Press & Journal. The personal attacks, by Trump, this paper, and by those utterly opposed to opposition just make my mind explode. I am local, I have lived in Aberdeen for the entirety of my 22 years and I truly believe, without self-interest or the need for my ego to be massaged, that the apparent economic benefit of this project when compared with the backhanded undermining methods by which permissions have been granted, is negligible. I am not opposed to development, but development under these circumstances is wrong. The fact that so many Aberdonians are willing to turn their back on the moral issues here makes me truly ashamed to be one. This city has no soul. As for the fact that those heavily involved with TUT are not from Aberdeen, that is because they were the best people for the job. I am personally acquainted with a number of the people mentioned above, and I know the blood, sweat and tears which has gone into their efforts. They are simply the mouth piece for a cohort of extremely concerned but less well-equipped locals like myself. These people care, and they also have a degree of perspective which is clearly lacking from this newspaper and from those unwilling to think outside their granite box. Aberdeen has potential, potential for great things, and these can be achieved in a transparent and morally acceptable fashion.
Esther Banks
Report this comment

So living, working and obtaining a degree in Aberdeen only constitute a 'tenuous link' to Aberdeen if someone originally comes from London? Does the P&J realise how dependent Aberdeen is on people who 'aren't from around here' (difficult to do an oo-arr accent in type, but you can add it yourself) but who have chosen to make the North East their home. Should I also go home to the Central Belt, having moved here a mere 21 years ago?
Alan Carter
Report this comment

So living, working and obtaining a degree in Aberdeen only constitute a 'tenuous link' to Aberdeen if someone originally comes from London? Does the P&J realise how dependent Aberdeen is on people who 'aren't from around here' (difficult to do an oo-arr accent in type, but you can add it yourself) but who have chosen to make the North East their home. Should I also go home to the Central Belt, having moved here a mere 21 years ago?
Alan Carter
Report this comment

There is NO requirement for either side to be local, but both sides and also many councillors profess to speak for the locals, THEY DO NOT. The people who have bankrolled this site and many like this, only want to be with a cause, any cause. They have a fame desire, and a desire to be noticed not just on this but on any cause they can find. Everyone has a right to object, but do not claim to be the local voice. Do not publicise untruths on your site and claim them to be factual. And yes Mrs Crosley we are in a democracy "The majority rule is often described as a characteristic feature of democracy" ( taken from Wiki) And the TUT supporters are in a minority. This is not about whether Aberdonians are wanting to turn their backs on morality, this is a bigger picture than that, this is all about a future. As for Blood ,sweat and tears, not sure where that would come in, i mean the website has a designer, the stories on the website have never been researched properly, there is little factual information there.
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

There is definitely a moral issue here. The Scottish government has demonstrated their willingness to roll over for cash.. what does that say for our system? And Donald Trump isn't our only future. I am ill-informed on matters such as these, but it seems as though we have been offered one opportunity, taken the bait, and have since failed to investigate alternatives. Speaking to fellow students from around the UK, they feel that Aberdeen is lacking a personality and sense of community, how a golf course can fix that is beyond my comprehension (especially when the economic merit of this project is still questionable). We just need to look to Edinburgh or Glasgow to see what is lacking here. Perhaps my previous post was a little emotive however I am feeling rather riled by this piece of horrendous journalism. You yourself have been just as bad in your assumptions, yes TUT is in the minority, we live in the oil capital of Europe, it wasn't ever going to be easy. That however, certainly does not take away from the fact that they are voicing the opinions of many local people, and I don't know how you or anyone else can possibly deny that. There was always going to be opposition to a project this controversial, somebody had to take the initiative to structure something and that is exactly what Martin Glegg has done. It's energy intensive to try and fight for this kind of cause, especially when people such as yourself choose to misconstrue the motivations of these people and opt for personal attacks, based on absolutely no evidence. So yes, there has been no blood shed, but I guarantee sweat and tears. I don't particularly wish to embroil myself in a huge debate about the development again, but I will ardently stand by the opinions which I have expressed concerning Tripping up Trump.
Esther Banks
Report this comment

Who exactly are the local voices supporting Trump's daring plans? The article mentions a resounding 15000 strong petition 'against' ... but where are the votes 'for'? Neil F again makes some good points in support of the Trump plan but lacks another 14999 people to back him up. Ok, so most were probably central belt , but can you even get 1000 signatures for your cause? Begs the question whether Trump bothered to count whether he had an 'aye' or a 'nay' from those most affected by his land grab scheme...
wind bag
Report this comment

The P&J are correct with their article and have presented the facts. Esther Banks and associates in TUT do not hold the moral high ground and should not be lecturing the North East on morality based upon assumptions and statements which lack content and could be construed as slanderous in the extreme. The right to object is not in question here but raise your objections based upon fact and stop making up lies. It has taken me a long time to gain enough courage to actually comment on what's going on here but like the majority in the North East who are all positively supportive of the project I am sick to the back teeth of the antics of TUT and unfortunately that now includes those who may have genuine objections but have associated themselves with the now suitably exposed charlatans of TUT.
Diane J Balmedie
Report this comment

I would like to know how many 'locals' exist in the Aberdeen business groups who claim to support Trump? We certainly know that there are none to speak of in the Trump camp itself - hardly a local team. Aberdeenshire has had many people over the decades who live and work here (and who have made here their permanent home) who originated elsewhere but who pay their taxes here and contribute to the local economy. On that basis, there are surely bound to be folk who are on either side of the argument that cannot claim to be 'born and bred'. Equally, it is clear that there are folk who have moved away from here that support Trump and think it's all a great idea, but don't have to put up with the consequences. As usual, another non-journalistic article from the P&J who have always had an agenda in this. Lots of greasy palms somewhere I think.
Sara Jameson
Report this comment

Everyone has a view or an opinion no matter which side they claim to be on. What i am against is this group claiming to be local, and claiming to know the local views of local people. No matter where people live they are entitled to a view, but do not claim to be local, do not claim to be the local voice. Plenty of locals support this development and if any of these groups would care to do a door to door survey, only then can they claim to no what the locals want. I do listen to all sides,up till now i am still all for the Trump development.
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

Here we have a unique habitat about to be destroyed by greed and all you can say is that some opponents to this wanton vandalism don’t happen to live locally…. So what are we do in Britain, forget the rain forests, Antarctica, oh and the Pandas…. We don’t live near enough to them, none of our business….. Just because it is a dune system does not make it any more important than any of the above… Maybe I don’t count either I live near Huntly,
Secret Jackson
Report this comment

Here we have a unique habitat about to be destroyed by greed and all you can say is that some opponents to this wanton vandalism don’t happen to live locally…. So what are we do in Britain, forget the rain forests, Antarctica, oh and the Pandas…. We don’t live near enough to them, none of our business….. Just because it is a dune system does not make it any more important than any of the above… Maybe I don’t count either I live near Huntly,
Secret Jackson
Report this comment

Here we have a unique habitat about to be destroyed by greed and all you can say is that some opponents to this wanton vandalism don’t happen to live locally…. So what are we do in Britain, forget the rain forests, Antarctica, oh and the Pandas…. We don’t live near enough to them, none of our business….. Just because it is a dune system does not make it any more important than any of the above… Maybe I don’t count either I live near Huntly,
Secret Jackson
Report this comment

The ECO balance, i am unsure where this development fits in. Aberdeenshire needs to survive, this development is destroying nothing. It is shoring up the sea defences, planting new grass will encourage new species,this habitat will not be destroyed, why would it. The new grass will encourage new species and welcome back the old. I also have no problem whether you live locally or not. Each to their own we all have opinions and are entitled to voice them. But do not profess to be local when you are not. Do not say you speak for others.
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

I'm afraid the argument regarding species diversity does not stand, a unique habitat will be destroyed and be replaced by an entirely new one, which is the problem. Anyway, thats not why I'm here. I, like Diane, have ducked out of these debates before now because they are horrendous. However, looking back over previous articles today I can see that the same topics are being covered time and time again. The statement above from Diane has almost word for word been repasted from a previous article and what I wish to say in response is that I do not believe what I have said to be slander. We can only know what we have been told from the 'top', the rest is pure speculation on both sides. From what has been presented to us, is has become apparent that the cirumstances by which approval was granted for this project were far from black and white, and for this I cannot be accused of lying. Perhaps considering the implications of this on the reputation of Scotland and Aberdeen makes me appear smug, but I'll have to live with that. 'Esther Banks and associates' is ridiculous and you know it. I am local, I happen to know a number of people mentioned because we go to university together. Don't tar me with your charlatan brush simply because I don't agree with you. As for TUT, there needed to be some sort of organised movement for those who really felt strongly against the project, just as the FOR movement has the Trump organisation - what else do you really need? Perhaps you don't agree with the methods they have employed to draw publicity to the campaign, however, they have allowed people opposed to this project to see that there is an organised movement, and that they wont be fighting a multi-billionaire on their own. You don't like the way it's been done, but you cannot deny that in order for there to be a fair debate on this issue, an organised body was necessary (again you may debate the level of organisation present but that does not take away from the main argument here). It does not matter where these people are from, they do have local support. Sure the opposition would love a huge legal team and a crew of professionals to fight their corner, but at the moment there is TUT.
Esther Banks
Report this comment

But Esther Banks, TUT have not published 1 true article about Trump. That is not the methods of a reputable body in debate. Read and do your own research on the articles about Trump. I agree both sides need to be heard, but not like this. I also do not think the planning permission was underhand, if D Storr and M Ford had voted with their constituents and not voted their own opinions or if they had held a local vote for their constituents, and then had they voted, then i am sure the vote would have been very different. Some councillors have spouted about democracy yet they have not let their local democracy have a say. D Trump is not whiter than white, but i feel he is giving Aberdeen/shire a future. Also down in England on a chalk quarry a new development was built along with a train station, they were worried about wildlife there, but the wildlife has returned and more besides, so yes i do think if you had done your research you would see how resilient wildlife can be. Wildlife will adapt,we will adapt. This habitat will change, but will still be unique. Too many people are making slanderous accusations, we should all stick to the facts.
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

Neil, can I please request that you refrain from being so condescending. I don't claim to be an expert in any field but my understanding of the dune system and what is essentially at stake is fairly solid. In this area can you please do your research, this particular dune system (or any for that matter) is not comparable with a quarry system, and the planting of marram grass will certainly not result in a unique habitat. If you can suggest an alternative to TUT which will truly be an impartial body to balance the views of both sides I'm more than all ears. I'm as fed up as the next person with this whole thing. If we are all going to stick to the facts then my opinion or yours as to the outcome of the voting in the first place, can only really be speculation. Whatever the case, one real fact, is that part of the site is a SSSI, and this was disregarded. One other real fact is that Trump has/is considering using CPO's. I feel strongly on both these points, as do a great number of other people.
Esther Banks
Report this comment

The effects on wildlife is comparable. Nothing will happen to the dunes apart from the fact the will no longer be able to move. This will keep the northeast safe with secure flood defenses should the need arise for many years to come. The planting of Maran grass itself will not i agree, but along with the dunes, the wildlife there at present will come back and new species to the area will arrive.As for analtenative there is none at present all i ask if for the supporters of this group to make sure they site does you all justice, by presenting the facts, nothing more nothing less. As for the voting M Ford a few years earlier voted to have a wind farm built on SSSI site up near Huntly, a wind farm as far as i understand is still a commercial development.
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

Esther, I do not think Neil is being condescending. I agree with him that if you are going to post a reply to one of his posts, you should do at least a little research. All I read on here are repetitive comments. Trump does this, Trump does that!! Then you TUT supporters have the nerve to accuse Mr Fraser of personal attacks. The only personal comments I can find of his relate to councillors who are either two faced or self opinionated. One of which opposes Trump for environmental issues not too long after supporting a development which had a major environmental impact. The other who puts their personal opinions to fellow councillors and not the opinions of their constituents. Please enlighten me on these personal attacks as I seem to be reading different posts than you. As for you David Milne, the only incredible damage this would result in would be to the remaining properties. I would like to know the reason for this being a "bad development" as so far the only bad I can see in this is the handling of certain situations, and not forgetting that you are unfortunate enough to be on the estate.
Local Quine
Report this comment

This is a dreadful article which fails to understand or examine the underlying principle. The pensioner who brought the case against Trump was entitled to choose whichever representation she choose. Whoever wants to support her can. Or is there an underlying near-racism which insists that only people born, bred and remaining within the narrow confines of the north east has a right to see what is happening or to have an opinion or to serve those who wish help? It is especially ironic given that Aberdonians for decades been far sighted and have been taking their experience of oil management to the wider world. This is Scotland, and it is meant to be one nation. We should all be paying attention to what is happening here - but the P+J seems to think that blinkers are to be desired and only north-easters are good enough to have an opinion. So what are 'links with the north east'? This article verges on bigotry. Shame on the editor who let this nonsense through.
mm daly
Report this comment

December 12th.2009 was a sad day for the notion of objective, unbiased journalism serving the community in this area. I happen to object to the Trump development ( and I live locally, by the way ) but that is irrelevant; I have long since accepted the inevitable. What is relevant - and still worth pointing out - is that, in all the coverage of this debate, both sides are bound to adopt aggressive, polarised positions, and it's ridiculous for the P&J to attack TUT for doing exactly this. In fact all the criticisms levelled at TUT could equally be levelled at the Trump organisation. The two sides will never see eye to eye. The crucial point here is that the press and other media should be attempting to pick an admittedly tricky path through all the conflicting arguments. For the P&J to abandon any pretence of objectivity and launch such a vehement and concerted onslaught against opponents of the Trump organisation's plans is frankly disgraceful. It is clearly a deliberate policy on the part of the paper's management. They should be ashamed of themselves. Whatever side you're on in this debate, ask yourself this - do you want your media to tell you what to think, or would you rather they try to present the facts and then let you make up your own minds? phil york, Udny
phil york
Report this comment

Phil well said
Neil Fraser
Report this comment

If the P&J crawled any further up Mr Trump's backside they would have to write this bilge with both hands through his nostrils to work the keyboard.
shona penny
Report this comment

I have to say I find this article outrageous and inflamatory. It is now my intention to write to my local MP, Richard Lochead (Moray) regarding this irresponsible piece of so called journalism. I am sure he will be interested in your views given that he comes from Paisley originally. Off course given that he was appointed cabinet minister for Environment and Rural Affairs in 2007 he has probably had a hand in the environmental crime that has unfolded here. I would have thought that would have made him one of Mr Crightons allies. Him a Glaswegian aswell. Tut, Tut Mr Crighton. I dont think I need to point out the Hypocrisy here to an obviously talented journalist such as yourself. It would appear that you are trying to insight some kind of regional bigotry here. Do you really think that this is a responsible way for a journalist to conduct himself. If you have ever witnessed the violence at a Rangers v Aberdeen game, chiefly driven by this kind of narrow minded thinking, you would maybe choose your words more carefully. As you obviously like to stir up inter-regional hatred maybe it is the police that should be having a word with you over this obviously bigoted propaganda. As a human being I am both disgusted and embarassed for you.
David Jess
Report this comment

I have to say I find this article outrageous and inflamatory. It is now my intention to write to my local MP, Richard Lochead (Moray) regarding this irresponsible piece of so called journalism. I am sure he will be interested in your views given that he comes from Paisley originally. Off course given that he was appointed cabinet minister for Environment and Rural Affairs in 2007 he has probably had a hand in the environmental crime that has unfolded here. I would have thought that would have made him one of Mr Crightons allies. Him a Glaswegian aswell. Tut, Tut Mr Crighton. I dont think I need to point out the Hypocrisy here to an obviously talented journalist such as yourself. It would appear that you are trying to insight some kind of regional bigotry here. Do you really think that this is a responsible way for a journalist to conduct himself. If you have ever witnessed the violence at a Rangers v Aberdeen game, chiefly driven by this kind of narrow minded thinking, you would maybe choose your words more carefully. As you obviously like to stir up inter-regional hatred maybe it is the police that should be having a word with you over this obviously bigoted propaganda. As a human being I am both disgusted and embarassed for you.
David Jess
Report this comment

The Press and Journal is happy to encourage discussion and debate on the topics featured within our newspaper and on our website.

However, we would urge people to respect the opinions of others even if they do not agree with them. We will not tolerate abusive comments of any type and such posts will be removed with the people responsible facing a ban from this website.

Only registered users can supply comments, and your registered name and location will automatically be appended to any comment that you upload.

We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using a false name or pseudonym.

To post a comment, please login using the form at the top of the page, or click to register.