Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Report reveals staff at north-east kids club where child died do not know how to help youngsters in an “emergency”

The Bettridge Centre in Newtonhill,
The Bettridge Centre in Newtonhill,

Workers at a north-east after-school club where a young boy died after choking on a grape have been slammed for not knowing how to help a child in an “emergency”.

Newtonhill Out of School Club has also been criticised by watchdogs after staff failed to notice a youngster had left the building and walked home.

It was only after they realised he was missing that the alarm was raised.

The failing was uncovered during recent checks by the Care Inspectorate.

Its damning inspection also discovered that numerous carers were not even registered with the social service’s regulatory body – which could have put children at “risk from harm”.

The failings come three years after a five-year-old boy choked on a grape while he was in the care of staff at the club, based at the Bettridge Centre in the village’s Graystone Place.

Louis Emaho was taken to the Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, but died shortly after being admitted in February 2012.

Following an investigation, police ruled there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding the incident.

And inspectors said they had “no concerns” about the quality of care following a subsequent Care Inspectorate visit triggered by the tragic accident.

But three years on, serious worries have now been raised about how the club is run – with inspectors grading the quality of the environment, the quality of staffing and the quality of management with grade two, weak.

During the unannounced visit, inspectors probed how prepared staff are in handling children’s medication and health concerns.

They discovered that although workers had received first aid training, some were not sure what to look for if a child took an allergic reaction.

“They were also not sure of all the steps to follow in an emergency situation, for example a child not responding to their medication,” they said.

“Staff must know what steps to follow in an emergency – lack of this knowledge could put a child at risk of harm.”

Last night, no one from the after-school club wanted to comment on the latest report.

A spokesman for the Care Inspectorate confirmed the inspection “raised some concerns”.

“We have specified the areas where we require improvement in our inspection report and we will continue to work with this service to ensure it improves,” he said.

“If we are not satisfied that sufficient progress is being made we will not hesitate to take further action.”

Scottish Social Service’s Council

The Care Inspectorate also discovered during recruitment checks that four members of staff were not registered with the Scottish Social Service’s Council (SSSC), or any other professional body.

The manager agreed to address the issue as a “matter of urgency” and said the carers would not work at the club again until their applications had been submitted.

The watchdog also discovered that some check forms from staff had been submitted only after they had been employed.

“This could put children at risk from harm as the provider could not confirm staffs ‘fitness’ to work with children prior to all checks being returned satisfactory,” they ruled.

Further concerns were raised about the children’s safety, with one parent worried about how secure the building is.

Staff said there were measures in place to keep children safe – for example, making sure the youngsters know the boundaries they are not allowed past.

“However, we were of the opinion this was not adequate enough,” the inspectors ruled.

“We were also made aware of an incident around Easter time when a child walked home from the service unauthorised and staff were not aware of this until later in the session when they became aware of the child not being there.

“The manager told us that an investigation into how this incident had happened had taken place and changes were made, however, none of the investigation or outcome had been recorded.”

When parents were questioned on what they thought of the service, they said they were happy with how the club was run.

The inspectors concluded: “Through comments received from parents/carers we concluded that Newtonhill

Out of School Club meets the needs of parents and families.

“The provider/manager must support staff to provide a service which continues to meet these needs but improves the quality of the service overall.”