Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scott Crichton Styles: Judges have rightly made an example of blogger Craig Murray and his reckless behaviour

Craig Murray jailed
Craig Murray was once a Dundee University rector

Freedom of speech is important, as is the ability to report criminal court proceedings.

Still, those principles must be balanced against the right of victims of alleged sexual assault to have their anonymity protected.

Scott Crichton Styles

Criminal court proceedings are generally public and reported on by the media on the familiar principle that justice must not only be done, but also be seen to be done.

However, a major exception to this of open justice rule are cases involving sexual assault, where the protection of vulnerable complainers is especially important, and where generally the press are prevented from identifying the complainer.

Sexual assault cases are in a special category for the obvious reason that alleged victims are in the vulnerable position of often having the most private aspects of their lives exposed in court. Without complete anonymity, victims would be highly unlikely to report sexual offences to the police.

Jigsaw identification

In March 2020, the former First Minister Alex Salmond went on trial for various alleged sexual offences and on March 23 he was acquitted of all charges. One of the people reporting on the trial and matters leading up to the trial was Scottish nationalist blogger, Craig Murray.

Murray seems to have been a man on a mission to expose what he saw as injustice in the proceedings against the accused. This zeal led him to post online material that could be used to identify the women testifying against Salmond.

Alex Salmond outside court during his trial in March 2020

On the second day of the trial, the court made an order “preventing the publication of the names and identity and any information likely to disclose the identity of the complainers in the case of HMA v Alexander Elliot Anderson Salmond”.

Although Murray did not identify the women by name, he linked them to various pieces of circumstantial evidence. This allowed what has become known as “jigsaw” identification.

Severe punishments for putting vulnerable witnesses at risk

Craig Murray’s conviction is unsurprising. He may well see himself as some kind of political prisoner, but in the eyes of the law – and probably most other people – he was simply a man who recklessly violated the confidentiality of vulnerable witnesses.

From a legal perspective, it is now clear that indirect identification is just as much a contempt of court as naming the parties. Had the court not decided as it did it would have been far too easy to identify vulnerable witnesses, making a mockery of the law designed for their protection.

He may well see himself as some kind of political prisoner, but Craig Murray was simply a man who recklessly violated the confidentiality of vulnerable witnesses

What is a little surprising is the length of the sentence given for this offence. Admittedly, eight months is not the maximum term of two years which the court could have imposed, but it is still a significant term in prison and well beyond a token stretch.

Obviously the High Court want to send the message that offences of contempt of court – especially those involving vulnerable witnesses in sexual offence cases – will be severely punished.

Scott Crichton Styles is Senior Lecturer in Law at Aberdeen University

Already a subscriber? Sign in