Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scottish livestock farmers have reduced emissions in past six years

Average emissions from Scottish livestock enterprises have reduced by 3-4% in the past six years.

The amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by Scottish livestock enterprises has reduced in the past six years, claims Quality Meat Scotland (QMS).

The red meat levy body’s chief economist, Stuart Ashworth, said estimates on the amount of greenhouse gases emitted from Scottish beef, sheep and pig enterprises show a reduction of between 3 and 10% since 2015.

Speaking during a press briefing to launch QMS‘s annual Scotland’s Cattle and Sheep Enterprise Profitability report, Mr Ashworth said the average reduction in greenhouse gas emission intensities was 3-4%, however better performing businesses achieved reductions of between seven and 10%.

He said results from the report show a direct correlation between technical performance, sound economic management and lower emissions intensity for the best producers.

“It’s fair to say that the gap between the top third [of producers] and the average has been widening slightly over the last decade,” added Mr Ashworth.

He said the core contributors to better performance remained things such as lower mortality rates, high conception rates, and minimal losses between birth and weaning – all of which resulted in having more product to sell in the marketplace.

“Equally though, improvements to resource use efficiency can contribute to improved profitability,” added Mr Ashworth.

“The report points towards benefits that come from things like maximising the potential and quality of grass and animals and seeking out innovations and fresh ideas.

“The gains from these individual details on their own may seem small but, when added together, lead to useful cumulative marginal gains in input efficiencies and cost savings.”

Mr Ashworth said although the report suggested a reduction in emissions on farms, they did not take into account carbon sequestration or each farm as a whole – solely the livestock enterprise.

“The challenge that we have is that the scientists have not yet fully grappled with carbon sequestration and incorporated it into their models,” added Mr Ashworth.

QMS chief executive, Alan Clarke, said the organisation was working with meat industry partners across the world to get carbon sequestration calculations incorporated into greenhouse gas measuring tools.

Farming For 1.5 calls for emissions reduction contracts for farmers

Already a subscriber? Sign in