Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Moray Council covered up ‘secret talks’ to close military barracks

Kinloss Barracks
Kinloss Barracks

Moray Council held “secret talks” with military chiefs about the closure of the Kinloss Barracks – four months ago.

It emerged yesterday that senior local authority officials and discussed the potential axing of the base with the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO).

It is heading the review which could lead to the barracks being shut – five years after the demise of Kinloss as an RAF station.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has insisted no decision had been made on the future of the barracks but campaigners are already laying plans to battle to keep them open.

Kinloss is home to 39 Engineer Regiment and employs more than 700 service personnel and pumps £30million into the local economy every year.

Moray MP Angus Robertson accused council chiefs of failing to challenge the MoD over “broken promises” to the region.

But the leader of the local authority said that the DIO insisted the conversations remain confidential.

The Army moved on to the site in 2012, following the controversial decision to close RAF Kinloss the previous year.

Moving 39 Engineer Regiment to the region was designed as a way of plugging the gap in the region’s economy.

In July 2011, then-defence secretary Liam Fox said the site’s rebirth as an Army barracks would “provide this part of the country with a good long-term future”.

Mr Robertson said it appeared the council was allowing the UK Government to “abandon promises” made to Moray in the wake of the closure of RAF Kinloss.

He added: “The emerging details of the threat to the Kinloss Army base show that the council, which is run by a Tory and Independent-led administration group, has been having discussions with the MoD over the future of the base.

“They have chosen not to publicly challenge the government on the promises made to Moray.

“The Tories have made promises to Moray – at UK Government level and at council level in Moray, there has to be accountability for those promises.

“Many service personnel and their families have made their home in Moray, and our local communities are hugely supportive of the bases.

“To close Kinloss Barracks and reduce the defence footprint even further in Scotland would be totally unacceptable.”

Council leader Stewart Cree said DIO chiefs had sworn the officers involved to secrecy, and insisted he was only made aware of the base being in jeopardy on Monday.

Mr Cree, who is an Independent councillor and heads the administration alongside Conservative convener Allan Wright, denied that any “collusion” had taken place.

He said: “Our senior officers have ongoing discussions with the DIO as a matter of business.

“They were on pain of death not to mention anything about this, because there could be commercial interests involved – that was how the DIO wanted to play it.

“I can put my hand on my heart and say I knew nothing about any of this.

“We have not been acting in collusion, anyone who was part of any proposal to close the barracks was required to keep that confidential.”

A council spokesman added: “Senior officers have had discussions with DIO representatives as part of the MoD’s footprint review.

“Given its close association with the military bases in its area, the council is frequently involved in discussions on a wide range of issues of common interest and by their nature these discussions are generally informal and confidential.”

The Ministry of Defence refused to comment on the discussions with the council.