Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Special fund will be used for A90 upgrade

Special fund will be used for A90 upgrade

A “developer bank” is to be set up to pay for a possible flyover at a notorious junction on the A90 Aberdeen-Dundee road.

The idea was hailed as a “very positive move forward” as MSPs decided to keep open a petition calling for improvements at Laurencekirk. Campaigners have been battling for several years to see a flyover – or grade-separated junction – be built on the A90 with its junction with the A937 road to Montrose.

The Scottish Government refused to comply at first, but as pressure mounted agreed to look into the issue.

The north-east transport authority Nestrans is conducting a study into the option. But Transport Minister Keith Brown has insisted a flyover must be funded by developers.

Holyrood infrastructure and capital investment committee decided yesterday to keep the petition open, as slow progress is being made. Convener Maureen Watt, SNP MSP for Aberdeen South and North Kincardine, said: “I think there is absolutely no doubt there is a need for a grade-separated junction at Laurencekirk.”

Ms Watt said there was no getting away from the fact the Scottish Government insists the upgrade must be paid by developer contribution.

She revealed that Nestrans officials said at a briefing in Aberdeen last week that the cost will not fall on just one developer.

“One of the things at the meeting – which I found immensely encouraging – was that instead of one developer at Laurencekirk having to fund it they are going to have a ‘developer bank’, so a number of developers pay into it. That is very positive,” she said.

Petitioner Jill Fotheringham said that while it was not the perfect solution, it was better than nothing.

“We are going to have to live with the idea the government have said it will have to be developer-funded,” she said.

“It is a bit of a poor show because it is on a trunk road and the trunk road is Transport Scotland’s responsibility.”

She added: “If it means it’s going to go ahead and make that junction safer, I welcome any progress.”

Nestrans director Derick Murray said developments in Laurencekirk fell within the Rural Housing Market Area and therefore were not required to contribute to the strategic transport fund. He added: “There is an allocation of 885 houses to the north of Laurencekirk within Aberdeenshire Council’s local development plan and developer contributions will be sought to improve access to the A90 road network.”