Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Aberdeen researcher ‘washes her hands’ of overbearing publisher

Post Thumbnail

An Aberdeen University researcher has resigned from a prestigious international journal after claiming she was put under pressure to produce “mediocre” work.

All 10 senior editors of the open-access journal Nutrients resigned at the end of August, alleging that the publisher, the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), pressured them to accept “manuscripts of mediocre quality and importance.”

The journal, which specialises in scientific breakthroughs in the field of nutrition, charged over £1,000 for authors to publish articles.

The former editors at Nurients argued that their bosses, MDPI, were trying to “push through” content that had not been adequately reviewed by the editorial board to make higher profits.

One of the senior editors to resign was Lynda Williams, a researcher at Aberdeen University’s Rowett Institute, who said editors had started to sense pressure to accept more articles in recent months.

She said: “There is currently a crisis in the field of scientific publication.

“The system we had in editing submissions before things could be published was very stringent.

“They were rigorously examined and none of the editors got paid to review the submissions, we did it to ensure the work was accurate for readers.

“Now that journals are open access, meaning anyone can read the content without needing to pay, it is harder to make profits sustainable.

“We were getting thousands of submissions to Nutrients, and naturally that meant our rejection rate went up.

“Since it now costs so much for articles to be published, we were encouraged to publish more to make to make MDPI’s profits greater.

“The editors decided to, as a team, wash their hands of the situation and we resigned.”

Her decision was encouraged when Jon Buckly, editor-in-chief of Nutrients, received an email from MDPI announcing he would be replaced at the end of the year by someone who would “bring different ideas on board.”

He resigned last month and nine other senior editors, including Ms Williams, followed suit.

MDPI chief executive, Franck Vazquez, said: “We are against setting an artificial rejection rate.

“Every article must be evaluated on quality, and if more papers are good enough, more should be published.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in