Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Inquiry to be held after ‘cronyism’ row at Robert Gordon University

Inquiry to be held after ‘cronyism’ row at Robert Gordon University

A Scottish Government body has launched an inquiry in the wake of the “jobs for the boys” fiasco at Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen.

The Scottish Funding Council (SFC) has stepped in following demands from trade unions and has ordered a “Lessons Learned Review” at the institution.

It is understood that the review will assess whether improvements in the governance and staff appointment process need to made across the higher education sector in Scotland.

The move was revealed as new details emerged of the way RGU’s principal Ferdinand von Prondzynski dramatically quit and was controversially replaced last month.

Official documents show that action was taken after RGU’s board heard there was “considerable concern amongst a broad spectrum of university employees” about the handling of a recent internal inquiry into the business link between Professor von Prondzynski and a recently-appointed vice-principal.

The board held a “series of meetings” with staff and managers in the week after the governors agreed not to sanction Prof von Prondzynski for failing to declare that he and vice-principal Gordon McConnell were co-directors of a firm which owned a £12million castle in Ireland.

After hearing from staff, the board “expressed deep concern regarding the destabilising effect” of the row at a special meeting on July 27, and it was agreed that chairman Mike Fleming should “discuss the matter with the principal as a matter of urgency”.

At the same meeting, the board was “working on the presumption that the principal would be stepping down in the near term”, and agreed that it was “imperative to stabilise the situation” by offering the top job to deputy principal, Professor John Harper.

But the move plunged RGU into a fresh “cronyism” controversy when the University and College Union (UCU) Scotland demanded an inquiry into the board’s failure to follow normal procedures for such a senior appointment, amid claims it demonstrated a “jobs for the boys” attitude.

Now it has emerged that the board convened again on Monday this week – for the fifth time since the Press and Journal revealed the “conflict of interest” claims on May 17 – to discuss a proposal from the SFC, in liaison with the Scottish Government, that a “Lessons Learned Review” be carried out.

Last night, an SFC spokesman said: “The Scottish Funding Council is responsible for endorsing the Good Higher Education Governance code once it has been developed by the University Chairs’ committee.

“Given this role, we consider it appropriate to consider what wider lessons can be learned from situations such as this, and SFC looks forward to working with its key partners to determine future best practice.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The SFC will work with the university and other sector representatives to consider what wider lessons can be learned from this situation.”

Mary Senior, UCU Scotland official, welcomed the move last night.

“It’s good to see the board of governors will be considering what lessons can be learned from recent events,” she said.

“UCU has urged the governors to join other universities in fully implementing the 2016 higher education governance act, by bringing two trade union nominees onto its board as soon as possible.

“This would go some way in restoring the confidence of the staff and students in the university’s senior management and governance arrangements.”

RGU declined to comment last night.