Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Catherine Deveney: Things have changed? Such corruption wouldn’t happen now? I wish I believed it

Bob Lambert
Bob Lambert

It is hard to reconcile the pictures of young Bob Lambert, complete with long dark hair and roguish twinkle, with the rather grave, grey-haired man he morphed into almost 40 years later.

Time changes most things – but not everything. An undercover police officer, Lambert fathered a child with an unsuspecting woman when he infiltrated activist groups in the 1980s.

The Metropolitan Police paid £425,000 compensation to the woman in 2014. Last week, they also settled with his son, now 35. Lambert’s face changed in that period. The face of “unacceptable” didn’t.

Catherine Deveney

There is a tendency to blame “the times” when it comes to ethics, a tactic frequently used in abuse cases. Couldn’t, wouldn’t happen now…It was the 60s…the 70s…times were different. Were they really?

No decent person ever thought harming a child was acceptable. Nor that it was fine to dupe someone you have a child with, telling them you are an activist when you are a cop, pretending you are free when you secretly have a wife and two children. “I didn’t consent to sleeping with Bob Lambert,” says Jacqui, who knew him as Bob Robinson. “It’s like state rape.”

It is, indeed, the state’s role in this that disturbs most. Perhaps we can empathise with Lambert the man, who says he regrets his actions. Most people carry regrets about their lives: pain inflicted that wasn’t meant. But Lambert’s actions were – either openly or obliquely – state sanctioned. They were done in your name and in mine.

They were done under the pretext of public protection. Protection from whom? “Anarchists” like Greenpeace London. Now that really is an anachronism: climate protesters considered more of a societal threat than ministers in their gas guzzling limousines.

Lambert did nothing to protect you or me. In fact, he corrupted something precious. The state should be a servant of the people, not a we-can-do-what-we-want-because-we-have-power elite that classifies legitimate social challenge as threat.

Lambert went on to be promoted head of the Special Demonstration Squad. Next job? Leading surveillance of the family of the murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence. Was the Lawrence family a threat? Or the white thugs who murdered him? The most objectionable part of all this is that Lambert was honoured for his work. He is an MBE.

Lambert had sex with four women in his covert police role but he wasn’t the only one. At one stage, 12 women had similar cases against the Met.  It was a “see no evil” operational tactic.

Most ethical systems are based on the same fundamental principles, one of which is non-maleficence, the resolution that actions should not cause any person harm. In this case, there’s a list of those harmed.

Firstly, Lambert took on the identity of a dead child, Bob Robinson, born in the same year but who died, aged seven, of congenital heart disease.

Stealing identities, he says, was commonplace in undercover operations. But how must Bob Robinson’s family have felt when they discovered his identity had been so misused?

Then there’s Jacqui. For two years, Lambert lived with her, apparently doting on their baby son, before claiming he had to flee temporarily to Spain to avoid arrest. She never saw him again.

“He told me he loved me all the time,” she once said in an interview in an American magazine. “I always felt that he was scared of losing me, and, in some ways, that felt quite powerful.”

Over the years, she tried to trace him. When she casually came across his picture in a newspaper in 2012, it was traumatic. How destabilising that experience must have been. Everything she thought was real, wasn’t. She later contemplated suicide.

When a thief breaks into a house, it is not usually the loss of valuables that causes most pain. It is the loss of worthless mementos of happy times; the small gifts from loved ones no longer alive; the photographs destroyed in the ransacking.

When a partner leaves, it may leave a person feeling like their future has been stolen. But you can create a new future. Lambert stole the irreplaceable: the past. It never existed.

Then there’s Lambert’s son, known in the legal case as TBS. TBS spent his early life yearning for a father. I wonder how it feels to subsequently discover your longed-for father bedded your mother for information. That you exist only because of professional deception.

This story didn’t end well for anyone involved. Lambert – unsurprisingly – divorced from his first wife and remarried. Sadly, both children from his marriage died; TBS is, ironically, his only surviving child. Jacqui married but was widowed at 31.

These are personal tragedies. But there’s a societal tragedy here too and in that respect, we’re all hurt by this.  One wonders what Cressida Dick, the current – and first female – head of the Met thinks. Things have changed? Such corruption couldn’t happen now? I wish I could believe it.